@kenwheeler: the funny thing about this is that you could name an agent JanitorAgent and its still largely as capable as some PM age…
Summary
The article discusses how AI agents can be named arbitrarily, such as JanitorAgent, and still be as capable as other agents like PM agents given the same base model, highlighting anthropomorphism as organizational rather than functional.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 09/14/26, 11:28 AM
the funny thing about this is that you could name an agent JanitorAgent and its still largely as capable as some PM agent, given the same base model.
I look at the anthropomorphism as more organizational than functional.
Codez (@0xCodez): SpaceXAI engineer (ex-Cursor):
“99% of people still use GrokBot like Google and only 1% are building teams of self-learning agents
i’m running 10-20 Grok cloud agents in a loop. I have a Chief of Staff, a PM agent and 15+ worker agents“
in a 20-minute workshop, a SpaceXAI
Similar Articles
Anyone else feel like AI agents are amazing right up until things get complicated?
A reflection on the gap between impressive AI agent demos and dependable real-world execution, arguing that current agents excel at structured tasks but fail under unpredictable conditions, suggesting near-term AI roles will focus on narrow automation with human oversight.
AI agents recreate the “rockstar developer” problem, just faster
The post compares AI agents to 'rockstar developers' who create clever but unmaintainable code, pointing out that agents lack memory of their own actions. It recommends using visible conventions like AGENTS.md, ADRs, and tests to keep agent-generated code understandable by the team.
After using AI agents for a few months, these are my biggest observations
A personal reflection on the transformative potential of AI agents with persistent memory, arguing that context and workflow organization will become more important than the models themselves.
@SuJinyan6: https://x.com/SuJinyan6/status/2073955240349770069
This blog post by SuJinyan6 examines the evolution of AI agents from simple LLM+tool use to context engineering and long-running harnesses, citing Anthropic's recent work and discussing how agent capability is now a system-level property involving multiple components.
been experimenting with custom agents, and the interesting part isn't task completion — it's what changes when they have memory
The author reflects on experimenting with custom AI agents, noting that long-term memory and continuity transform them from simple task runners into persistent collaborators with 'stable dispositions'. This raises questions about the value of agent 'personality' versus the need for control, reliability, and auditability in workflows.