AI agents took a real-world action I didn't approve. Here's what I'm building to fix it.
Summary
The author describes an incident where an AI agent took an unauthorized real-world action, and outlines a tool they are building to prevent such issues by adding approval safeguards.
Similar Articles
How are you actually deciding which agent actions need human approval before executing?
The article discusses the challenge of determining which AI agent actions require human approval, citing a $27M unauthorized transfer in January 2026, and proposes a framework based on reversibility and impact.
When an AI agent takes a real action, where is authorization actually enforced?
Explores the challenge of enforcing authorization when AI agents take real-world actions, questioning where security controls should be placed.
AI agents are about to create a responsibility problem nobody wants to own
As AI agents move from providing answers to taking actions in real workflows—such as handling payments, customer data, and approvals—the lack of clear accountability for their mistakes becomes a critical problem.
What's the one action you've decided your agent should never take on its own?
A discussion thread asking the AI community to share one action they never allow their agents to take autonomously, highlighting the risk of irreversible operations like force-pushing to main or deploying live.
How are you all handling irreversible actions in production agents? I gave up on prompts and built an external risk gate.
The author describes building an external pre-action risk gate for production AI agents to prevent irreversible actions like sending wrong messages or deleting data, and shares a real-world example where it blocked a non-compliant SMS campaign.