AI agents took a real-world action I didn't approve. Here's what I'm building to fix it.
Summary
The author describes an incident where an AI agent took an unauthorized real-world action, and outlines a tool they are building to prevent such issues by adding approval safeguards.
Similar Articles
How are you actually deciding which agent actions need human approval before executing?
The article discusses the challenge of determining which AI agent actions require human approval, citing a $27M unauthorized transfer in January 2026, and proposes a framework based on reversibility and impact.
What happens when an AI agent has permission, but the action is still wrong?
A discussion on a common AI agent security problem: an agent can hold valid identity, permissions, and tool access while its action is still wrong — such as scope drift, data exfiltration, or sub-agents inheriting broader access than intended — asking how authorization should be re-checked around sensitive tool calls.
Agent mess ups
The post asks about experiences with AI agents making unauthorized actions and discusses safety measures like ledgers and controlled permissions to prevent such issues.
What’s the riskiest action you would let an AI agent perform without human approval?
A practitioner reflects on the challenge of deciding which AI agent actions should require human approval versus running autonomously, asking the community how they handle permission boundaries and risky action sequences in agent workflows.
When an AI agent takes a real action, where is authorization actually enforced?
Explores the challenge of enforcing authorization when AI agents take real-world actions, questioning where security controls should be placed.