I tested 5.6 Terra for writing optimized C++ code and functions. And I'm shocked. Its edited about 30 files and wrote 2,000 lines of code. I spent about an hour checking it all. I couldn't find a single error; it perfectly mimicked even my programming style. We are finished guys...
Summary
The author tested an AI model, 5.6 Terra, for writing optimized C++ code and was shocked by its ability to edit 30 files and write 2,000 lines of error-free code that mimicked their programming style, leading to estimates of 5x to 10x productivity increases.
Similar Articles
Introducing GPT-6.1 Terra
OpenAI 发布 GPT-6.1 Terra,一款兼顾视觉推理、计算机操作与自然写作的高效模型,API 价格较 GPT-5.6 Terra 低 50%,在 Agents' Last Exam、MMMU-Pro、OSWorld 2.1 和 Terminal-Bench 4.0 等基准上大幅提升,同时显著降低幻觉与事实错误率。
Opus 5.5 is insane, even in the hands of someone who barely understands github. I was able to use it to make a video game in 4 days.
A person with minimal programming experience used AI tools, including Opus 5.5 (Claude), to create a playable video game level in four days, showcasing the rapid capabilities of AI in creative and software development.
@reach_vb: 6.1 Terra beats Astra at vision tasks all whilst being ~47% faster and ~92% cheaper
据 SkalskiP 的测试,GPT-6.1 Terra 在文本、目标检测和计数等视觉基准上超越 Astra,同时速度快约 47%、成本低约 92%,结果令人难以置信。
GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-6 Astra: is a $1.20 model good enough for code review?
Benchmarked GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-6 Astra across 50 real PRs, showing Astra found 92 bugs vs Luna's 69, with Luna catching 75% of bugs at 3.6% of the cost. Includes detailed evaluation breakdown and upcoming comparison with Fable 5.1.
@sama: 6.1 Terra is here! It is good at a lot of things, but we are especially excited for this new era of computer use.
GPT-6.1 Terra 发布,OpenAI 称其在快速、能干的计算机使用(computer use)方面实现新突破,能理解屏幕内容、跨应用执行操作,并以更低价格提供更高效的工作能力。