@tdinh_me: Just tried this in my codebase, burned ~$70 worth of tokens and resulted in 30+ PRs, all non-critical but totally legit…
Summary
A developer reports using an AI tool on their codebase, spending ~$70 on tokens to generate 30+ legitimate but non-critical security fixes.
Similar Articles
Built an AI PR review workflow that generates actual fix PRs instead of just comments
The author built an AI-powered PR review workflow that generates actual fix PRs instead of just comments, claiming to be 6x cheaper than CodeRabbit and more accurate on large PRs.
For every $1 spent on AI coding tools, only $0.18 reaches production. Analyzed 1M+ PRs to find where the rest goes.
A study of over 1 million pull requests found that only $0.18 of every dollar spent on AI coding tools reaches production, with the rest going to bug fixes, rework, and review. The analysis shows that while PR volume grew 2.6x, reverted PRs grew 3.7x, indicating failures scaling faster than output.
@IntuitMachine: Your AI coding agent just burned $2 on a single bug fix. You thought it was "cheap automation." Here's what 16,000 prod…
An analysis of AI coding agent costs reveals that agentic workflows can use up to 3,500x more tokens than a simple ChatGPT call, with most waste coming from redundant context loading. The article suggests tracking repeated file actions and using efficient models to cut costs.
@FinanceYF5: 3/【Chintan Turakhia · Coinbase】 Leading a 1000-person engineering team to truly adopt AI, PR review time cut from 150 hours to 15 hours, and achieved a "legendary feat": merging 70 PRs in 15 minutes. He says: Stop talking about adopting AI, go solve problems.
Chintan Turakhia, engineering lead at Coinbase, shares how the team used AI for code review, reducing PR review time from 150 hours to 15 hours, and setting a record of merging 70 PRs in 15 minutes. He emphasizes focusing on solving problems rather than just talking about adopting AI.
@wesbos: Burned $91.34 with Claude Code /goal in 3.5 hours Unreal, It was able to reverse engineer it!
Developer Wes Bos spent $91.34 using Claude Code over 3.5 hours to successfully reverse engineer a project, highlighting the potential power and cost of AI-assisted coding.