What Is Missing in Surgical Risk Stratification and Outcome Prediction: A Scoping Review of End-to-End Machine Learning Approaches

arXiv cs.LG Papers

Summary

A scoping review of 190 studies characterizing end-to-end machine learning pipelines for surgical risk stratification and outcome prediction using EHR data, identifying methodological gaps in preprocessing, evaluation, and explainability.

arXiv:2607.29090v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Postoperative adverse events, including mortality and morbidity, remain a major global burden, many of which are preventable through early identification of high-risk patients and targeted perioperative care. Accurate risk stratification is therefore essential. With the growing availability of large-scale electronic health records (EHRs), machine learning (ML) provides a data-driven approach to model complex clinical patterns. However, existing studies vary widely in design, and methodological practices remain fragmented. This scoping review characterizes ML pipelines for surgical risk stratification and outcome prediction using EHR data. We reviewed 190 studies covering the ML workflow, including data preprocessing, algorithm selection, model evaluation, and explainability. Most studies relied on single-center private datasets with limited data modalities, while the scarcity of open-access surgical datasets constrained reproducibility and generalizability. Reporting of key preprocessing steps, including missing data handling, feature selection, and class imbalance, was often incomplete. Conventional ML models and simple neural networks predominated, whereas deep learning and multimodal approaches remained uncommon. Benchmark datasets and standardized evaluation protocols were largely absent, hindering cross-study comparisons. Only about one-third of studies incorporated explainability methods. This review identifies methodological gaps limiting clinically robust postoperative ML tools and provides a structured reference to support more rigorous, reproducible, and clinically meaningful ML development for perioperative care.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 08/03/26, 07:36 AM

# What Is Missing in Surgical Risk Stratification and Outcome Prediction: A Scoping Review of End-to-End Machine Learning Approaches
Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.29090](https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.29090)
[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.29090)

> Abstract:Postoperative adverse events, including mortality and morbidity, remain a major global burden, many of which are preventable through early identification of high\-risk patients and targeted perioperative care\. Accurate risk stratification is therefore essential\. With the growing availability of large\-scale electronic health records \(EHRs\), machine learning \(ML\) provides a data\-driven approach to model complex clinical patterns\. However, existing studies vary widely in design, and methodological practices remain fragmented\. This scoping review characterizes ML pipelines for surgical risk stratification and outcome prediction using EHR data\. We reviewed 190 studies covering the ML workflow, including data preprocessing, algorithm selection, model evaluation, and explainability\. Most studies relied on single\-center private datasets with limited data modalities, while the scarcity of open\-access surgical datasets constrained reproducibility and generalizability\. Reporting of key preprocessing steps, including missing data handling, feature selection, and class imbalance, was often incomplete\. Conventional ML models and simple neural networks predominated, whereas deep learning and multimodal approaches remained uncommon\. Benchmark datasets and standardized evaluation protocols were largely absent, hindering cross\-study comparisons\. Only about one\-third of studies incorporated explainability methods\. This review identifies methodological gaps limiting clinically robust postoperative ML tools and provides a structured reference to support more rigorous, reproducible, and clinically meaningful ML development for perioperative care\.

## Submission history

From: Yizhi Dong \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/b3b24258/2607.29090)\] **\[v1\]**Fri, 31 Jul 2026 07:16:50 UTC \(1,171 KB\)

Similar Articles

A Survey of Applications of ML in Healthcare

ML at Berkeley

This blog post provides a high-level survey of machine learning applications in healthcare, covering medical imaging, wearables, and molecular biology. It highlights how ML can shift medicine from curative to preventative and improve hospital workflows without replacing healthcare workers.

LLMs for Cardiovascular Risk Prediction from Structured Clinical Data

arXiv cs.CL

This paper presents a hybrid framework that combines structured clinical data with LLM-generated narratives for coronary artery disease prediction, achieving high fidelity in variable extraction and comparing ML models with LLM-based zero-shot and few-shot classification.