If AI's can be banned with no due process AI is not going to transform anything.
Summary
A comment argues that if AI systems can be banned without due process, the transformative potential of AI will be limited, using the example of Mythos.
Similar Articles
The ban on Mythos is entirely performative.
The article argues that the ban on the publicly disclosed AI model Mythos is performative and creates perverse incentives for secrecy, suggesting that regulators should focus on increasing visibility into private AI development rather than targeting openly shared models.
How Anthropic may have talked itself into an AI export ban
The US government imposed an export ban on Anthropic's AI model Mythos after the company's safety claims and government talks led to concerns, sparking debate on AI regulation and national security.
Mythologizing AI makes it more likely that we’ll fail to operate it well (2023)
A computer scientist argues that the term 'A.I.' is misleading and dangerous, advocating for viewing AI as a tool rather than a mythical creature to avoid mismanagement and potential harm.
@corbin_braun: the government doesn't want you to have access to powerful AI, what could possibly go wrong.
A tweet expressing skepticism about government restrictions on access to powerful AI.
What Should Anthropic Do After the Fable 5 Ban? — A Strategic Proposal with 18 Sources
A strategic proposal for Anthropic after the hypothetical US government ban of the powerful AI model Fable 5, arguing that AI can be taken away at any moment and advocating for safe but accessible frontier AI.