SWE-Explore: Benchmarking How Coding Agents Explore Repositories
Summary
SWE-Explore introduces a benchmark for evaluating coding agents' repository exploration capabilities, requiring ranked lists of relevant code regions within line budgets. Experiments show agentic exploration outperforms traditional retrieval, and line-level coverage remains a key differentiator.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/09/26, 08:43 AM
Paper page - SWE-Explore: Benchmarking How Coding Agents Explore Repositories
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2606.07297
Abstract
SWE-Explore introduces a benchmark for evaluating coding agents’ repository exploration capabilities by requiring ranked lists of relevant code regions within line budgets, demonstrating that agentic exploration outperforms traditional retrieval methods.
Repository-level coding benchmarks such asSWE-benchhave driven a rapid surge in the capabilities ofcoding agents. Yet they usually treat coding tasks as a holistic, binary prediction problem (e.g., resolved or unresolved), neglecting fine-grained agent capabilities such asrepository understanding,context retrieval,code localization, andbug diagnosis. In this paper, we introduceSWE-Explore, a benchmark that isolates the evaluation ofrepository exploration, a critical capability ofcoding agents. Given a repository and an issue,SWE-Exploreasks an explorer to return a ranked list of relevant code regions under a fixedline budget.SWE-Explorecovers 848 issues across 10 programming languages and 203 open-source repositories. For each instance, we derive line-level ground truth from independent agent trajectories that successfully solved the same issue, distilling the specific code regions their solution paths actually consulted. We evaluate exploration along coverage,ranking, andcontext-efficiencydimensions, showing that these metrics strongly track downstream repair behavior. Across a broad set ofretrieval methods, generalcoding agents, and specialized localizers, we find thatagentic explorersform a clear tier above classical retrieval. While file-level localization is already strong for modern methods,line-level coverageand efficientrankingremain the key axes differentiating state-of-the-art explorers.
View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageGitHub5Add to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2606\.07297
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.07297 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper1
#### SWE-Explore-Bench/SWE-Explore-Bench Viewer• Updatedabout 17 hours ago • 848 • 61 • 6
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.07297 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper1
Similar Articles
SWE Context Bench just proved something I think a lot of coding agent users already feel
A new benchmark paper 'SWE Context Bench' tests whether coding agents can reuse knowledge across tasks, highlighting a gap in existing benchmarks that only evaluate isolated problem-solving. The author discusses solutions like external memory and mentions tools such as langmem, mem0, supermemory, and Greplica.
Feels like coding agents are good at finding code but bad at understanding projects
Discusses the observation that while coding agents are effective at locating code, they struggle with deeper project understanding, such as component relationships and project style. The author introduces RepoWise, a tool that provides repository-level signals like dependency graphs and git history to address these issues.
DeNovoSWE: Scaling Long-Horizon Environments for Generating Entire Repositories from Scratch
DeNovoSWE is a large-scale dataset for training code agents to generate entire software repositories from documentation, using a sandboxed agentic workflow and difficulty-aware filtering. Fine-tuning Qwen3-30B-A3B on it boosts performance on the BeyondSWE-Doc2Repo benchmark from 5.8% to 47.2%.
SaaSBench: Exploring the Boundaries of Coding Agents in Long-Horizon Enterprise SaaS Engineering
SaaSBench is a new benchmark for evaluating AI agents in enterprise SaaS development, involving multi-component system integration across 30 tasks, 6 domains, and 5,370 validation nodes. Experiments reveal that the main bottleneck for agents is system configuration and integration rather than isolated code generation.
SWE-WebDevBench: Evaluating Coding Agent Application Platforms as Virtual Software Agencies
This paper introduces SWE-WebDevBench, a comprehensive 68-metric framework for evaluating AI-powered application development platforms as virtual software agencies. The study highlights critical gaps in current platforms regarding specification understanding, backend reliability, production readiness, and security.