There's a new way to break RSA that's faster than anything we've seen before
Summary
A new forgery attack on RSA blind-signature implementations is faster than previous methods, drastically lowering security levels for textbook RSA, though it poses minimal threat to most real-world systems using padded RSA.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 09/24/26, 01:03 PM
Similar Articles
Forging 1024-bit RSA signatures in nearly SNFS time
This paper presents a method for forging 1024-bit RSA signatures with complexity close to the Special Number Field Sieve algorithm, highlighting a potential security risk in widely used cryptographic systems.
@matthew_d_green: This is a very neat result!
A team implemented 1024-bit RSA signature forgery in nearly SNFS time, showing that temporary HSM access allows attackers to forge arbitrary signatures without factoring the key.
I've factored the RSA keys of a Certificate Authority from the 90s
The author factored 512-bit RSA keys from a defunct Certificate Authority shipped in Netscape browsers in the 90s, demonstrating the weakness of old cryptographic standards.
Factoring "short-sleeve" RSA keys with polynomials
Researchers found that RSA keys with heavily biased bits (mostly zeros) can be factored quickly using polynomial techniques, affecting keys from CompleteFTP and others. The study identifies hundreds of vulnerable keys and traces the bug to a type mismatch in big-integer code.
We found a method to make reverse engineering with agents over 700x more expensive to the attacker while adding only a small linear cost to the defender.
A proposed Rust macro technique that makes reverse engineering attacks over 700x more expensive while only adding small linear overhead to the defender, with suggestions it could be made exponentially costly in constant time similar to RSA.