There's a new way to break RSA that's faster than anything we've seen before

Ars Technica Papers

Summary

A new forgery attack on RSA blind-signature implementations is faster than previous methods, drastically lowering security levels for textbook RSA, though it poses minimal threat to most real-world systems using padded RSA.

<p>The world has known for decades that the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_cryptosystem">RSA cryptosystem</a>’s days are numbered. Once quantum computing becomes practical (estimates for that range from 3 to 20 or more years), the foundational security it provides will crumble. New research has revealed a novel method that uses classical computing to reduce the current RSA security level to an unacceptably low threshold.</p> <p>The finding poses little to no practical threat in the immediate term, except possibly in a few edge cases. Even applying the attack against the deprecated use of 1024-bit keys, the method requires more computation than just about anybody—short of nation-states or companies with massive resources—can achieve. Widely used RSA implementations are also safe.</p> <p>Nonetheless, the research has taken cryptographers by surprise because it introduces signature forgery, a new way to break RSA keys without factoring. Equally important, this novel method reduces the required computing resources by orders of magnitude.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/09/theres-a-new-way-to-break-rsa-thats-faster-than-anything-weve-seen-before/">Read full article</a></p> <p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/09/theres-a-new-way-to-break-rsa-thats-faster-than-anything-weve-seen-before/#comments">Comments</a></p>
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 09/24/26, 01:03 PM

# There's a new way to break RSA that's faster than anything we've seen before Source: [https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/09/theres-a-new-way-to-break-rsa-thats-faster-than-anything-weve-seen-before/](https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/09/theres-a-new-way-to-break-rsa-thats-faster-than-anything-weve-seen-before/) The forgery attack drops these levels to 265, 290, and 2119for 1024\-, 2048\-, and 4096\-bit keys respectively\. These levels may further drop because Heninger’s team did all the coding by hand and used no AI or GPUs in performing the forgeries\. The researcher said these tools will “almost certainly” drop the security levels further\. The attack works only against[blind\-signature](https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-irtf-cfrg-rsa-blind-signatures-02.html)implementations of RSA\. The overwhelming majority of RSA in use today provides PKCS or PSS padding, a format that adds data to the plaintext before it’s encrypted\. It prevents ciphertext from being deterministic and makes it less vulnerable to side channel and similar attacks\. Still, some real\-world systems continue to use blind\-signature, also known as textbook, RSA\. The best\-known example, Heninger said, is[Privacy Pass](https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/04/21/privacy-pass/#card-computers), a protocol that allows users to authenticate themselves without revealing their identity\. Privacy Pass is used by both Apple and Cloudflare, among many others\. An attack on Privacy Pass would require an attacker to compromise a server belonging to Cloudflare, Apple, or another organization and generate 243signatures\. Heninger said the requirement “sounds \[like\] a lot, but is on the same order of magnitude of the network traffic that Cloudflare has said publicly it handles in about a day\.” Most Privacy Pass implementations rotate keys regularly, a measure that greatly reduces, but doesn’t automatically eliminate, the chances of attacker success\. The technique implements a variant of the number field sieve algorithm that was[invented](https://eprint.iacr.org/2007/424)in 2007\. This “‘special’ number field sieve” is used against an “oracle,” a weakness in RSA and some other cryptosystems that gives yes\-or\-no answers to specific queries\. By performing a massive number of operations, attackers can gather enough information to decipher the ciphertext\. \(Again, this technique poses no practical threat against RSA that uses PKCS or PSS padding, because they eliminate the oracle\.\) While factoring a 1024\-bit key requires an estimated 280operations and 500,000 to 1 million CPU core\-years, using the sieve to forge a signature took just \(as noted earlier\) 265operations and 1,380 core\-years\. The paper’s authors and other researchers stress that the new attack poses little real\-world threat\. It does, however, drastically lower the estimated security of textbook RSA, and it does so in a way no one knew of previously\. Cryptographers have worked furiously in recent years to devise alternative cryptosystems that aren’t vulnerable to quantum computing attacks\. The new attack will further increase the urgency of completely moving away from the cryptosystem\. The paper authors provide an easier\-to\-digest explainer[here](https://github.com/ucsd-hacc/NSNFSSSFSFN)\.

Similar Articles

Forging 1024-bit RSA signatures in nearly SNFS time

Lobsters Hottest

This paper presents a method for forging 1024-bit RSA signatures with complexity close to the Special Number Field Sieve algorithm, highlighting a potential security risk in widely used cryptographic systems.

@matthew_d_green: This is a very neat result!

X AI KOLs Timeline

A team implemented 1024-bit RSA signature forgery in nearly SNFS time, showing that temporary HSM access allows attackers to forge arbitrary signatures without factoring the key.

Factoring "short-sleeve" RSA keys with polynomials

Lobsters Hottest

Researchers found that RSA keys with heavily biased bits (mostly zeros) can be factored quickly using polynomial techniques, affecting keys from CompleteFTP and others. The study identifies hundreds of vulnerable keys and traces the bug to a type mismatch in big-integer code.