Who’s Afraid of Chinese Models?
Summary
Ben Thompson proposes US legislation to explicitly allow training data as fair use and bar terms of service that forbid distillation, arguing this could help US open models compete with Chinese counterparts, and suggests Alibaba's release of Qwen 3.8 Max may have been influenced by Xi Jinping's call for open source collaboration.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/20/26, 05:26 PM
Similar Articles
Who’s Afraid of Chinese Models?
This article analyzes the implications of Chinese open weights AI models like Kimi K3, arguing that while R&D is free for users, inference costs (COGS) remain significant, challenging the notion of free AI and highlighting a return to marginal costs in the era of zero marginal cost software.
OpenAI is scared of open-weight models. Should the US be?
Discussion of the debate sparked by Chinese open-weight model Kimi K3, where OpenAI executive suggested regulatory crackdown but retracted after pushback. The US government is considering banning advanced Chinese models, raising questions about free markets, data security, and the future of AI innovation.
@aaditsh: China gave its models away when it was behind. Qwen, DeepSeek, GLM. All were open. The strategy was to commoditize the …
Analysis of China's open-source AI strategy, which initially gave away models to commoditize the layer, leading to significant token routing through Chinese models. Now, as Chinese models approach frontier capabilities, Beijing is considering restricting access.
There is no need to worry about Trump banning China‘s open source model at all.
A Chinese perspective argues that potential Trump-era bans on Chinese open-source AI models can be circumvented by using Vietnamese companies as distributors and re-labeling models as Vietnamese-origin, ensuring continued global access.
Beijing is looking at curbing overseas access to China's top AI models (Reuters)
Beijing is reportedly considering measures to restrict foreign access to China's top AI models, according to Reuters.