Are Al agents a feature, or do they need to become a production system?
Summary
This article explores whether AI agents should be treated as a full production system with persistent context, tool access, and feedback loops, rather than just a feature layer in existing workflows.
Similar Articles
AI agents are starting to look less like software and more like employees
The article argues that AI agents are evolving from being evaluated solely on intelligence to requiring operational reliability, governance, and team integration akin to human employees, highlighting the need for new infrastructure layers.
Where AI agents actually break in real workflows (not demos)
A discussion on where AI agents fail in real workflows, highlighting issues with coordination, reliability under messy inputs, and the challenge of reducing human intervention in production.
Do production agents need their own kind of PaaS?
The article argues that production AI agents require a new platform abstraction beyond traditional PaaS, focusing on non-deterministic planning, durable execution, authorization, and auditability.
We're spending too much time building agents and not enough time thinking about production
This article argues that the AI community focuses too much on building capable agents and not enough on the operational challenges of deploying them reliably in production, highlighting the need for better visibility, debugging, and system robustness.
An AI agent isn’t production-ready until a human can take over halfway through a run
The article argues that AI agents are not production-ready unless they allow human intervention mid-run, emphasizing the need for legible state, bounded permissions, and recovery paths over full autonomy.