A study in Communications Sustainability explores using basalt instead of limestone to make cement, potentially cutting CO2 emissions by nearly 30% with fossil-fuel electricity and nearly eliminating them with clean electricity, though energy use doubles.
<p>Cement production alone currently accounts for about 8 percent of global CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, so considerable effort is going into lowering that number. Efficiency can be increased, and energy sources can be swapped for cleaner ones, but a stubborn reality remains: The byproduct of turning limestone into lime during cement production releases CO<sub>2</sub> gas. These “direct process emissions” are actually slightly larger than the emissions from burning fuel to heat the kilns and drive this process.</p>
<p>A new paper in Communications Sustainability suggests a route to eliminating direct process emissions by removing a bedrock assumption. What if we don’t have to use limestone cement?</p>
<h2>Get out of Portland</h2>
<p>The material we call “Portland cement” was developed in the 1800s. It simply requires heating limestone (calcium carbonate) and adding something like clay or coal ash. This gives you the calcium oxide (lime) you’re after but also releases the CO<sub>2</sub> that results when you pull an oxygen atom from carbonate.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/05/running-the-numbers-on-a-zero-emission-way-to-make-cement/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/05/running-the-numbers-on-a-zero-emission-way-to-make-cement/#comments">Comments</a></p>
# Making cement from a different type of rock could clean up emissions
Source: [https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/05/running-the-numbers-on-a-zero-emission-way-to-make-cement/](https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/05/running-the-numbers-on-a-zero-emission-way-to-make-cement/)
Those steps \(along with follow\-up reactions to restore the acid or other chemicals to a usable state\) obviously add up in terms of cost and energy use\. Tallying up the energy to do all this using common techniques, the researchers found that you need to use a little more than double the energy of traditional production from limestone\.
The interesting thing is that, according to thermodynamics, the chemical conversion of basalt minerals to calcium oxide only requires around half as much as the conversion from limestone\. The problem is that our techniques to facilitate that chemical conversion are quite inefficient, so we don’t get anywhere near what is theoretically possible\.
## Better options?
The researchers note that there are at least some known lab techniques that could greatly improve our efficiency if they can be applied at scale, but even if we’re stuck with doubled energy usage, producing Portland cement from basalt would significantly reduce CO2emissions\. That’s because the direct liberation of CO2from limestone is eliminated and because the whole process can run on electricity\.
Assuming you use electricity from a fossil\-fuel\-dominated grid, they estimate that emissions would be cut by almost 30 percent\. Using clean electricity would eliminate most of the remaining emissions\.
The trade\-off, obviously, would be cost, which generally wins out over the sustainability of a livable environment\.
But there is another interesting aspect to this idea: The other components of the basalt also have value\. Iron, magnesium, and aluminum could also be separated and recovered, and leftover silicate material can serve as the additive for Portland cement instead of something like coal ash\. So if these things were done together, the process could become more economically feasible\.
That’s a lot of ifs and buts, but this relatively simple analysis can at least point to what would have to happen to make this viable\. And given that cement is one of the tougher nuts to crack in the struggle to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions, concrete solutions are welcome\.
Communications Sustainability, 2026\. DOI:[10\.1038/s44458\-026\-00056\-4](http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s44458-026-00056-4)\([About DOIs](http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2010/03/dois-and-their-discontents-1.ars)\)\.
A study reveals that weathering of organic carbon can release CO2, amplifying warming, while silicate weathering still draws down CO2 but must work harder. This adds a small amplifying effect to human-caused warming over centuries.
Researchers have developed a method to convert polystyrene waste into a solid material that effectively captures CO2 from both smokestacks and ambient air, with tunable properties that could help reduce plastic waste and the carbon footprint of carbon capture.
Climate tech companies are pivoting to critical minerals as political support for climate causes wanes, with examples like Boston Metal raising funds for metals production and Brimstone emphasizing critical minerals alongside cement.
Research shows that sulfur dioxide aerosols from coal burning reduce solar power production by up to 7.7% in regions with high coal usage, offsetting growth in countries like China. The study highlights an additional incentive to transition away from coal.
Silvis Materials, led by Patty Ferreira, is developing biodegradable cellulose adhesives to replace petroleum-based glues, which hinder recycling and increase emissions. The technology is being tested with industry partners to potentially cut production emissions by 80%.