@elonmusk: Try Composer 2.5
Summary
Composer 2.5 achieves 63.2% on CursorBench at $0.55 per task, nearly matching top models at 20x lower cost.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 05/21/26, 10:13 AM
Try Composer 2.5
BridgeMind (@bridgemindai): New CursorBench results just dropped.
Two big takeaways.
Composer 2.5 is way better than most people think.
63.2% score at $0.55 per task.
Nearly matching Opus 4.7 Max and GPT 5.5 Extra High at 20x less cost.
This is insane value.
Gemini 3.5 Flash is #10 at 49.8%.
Similar Articles
@elonmusk: Amazing price for performance!
Elon Musk praises the performance of Composer 2.5, a model from Cursor, as Lee Robinson solicits feedback for improvements.
@elonmusk: Try Composer 2.5 on Cursor!
Elon Musk announces that Composer 2.5 is now the most-chosen model in Cursor, with users receiving 10x usage for the rest of the day.
@cursor_ai: Introducing Composer 2.5, our most powerful model yet. It's more intelligent, better at sustained work on long-running …
Cursor AI announces Composer 2.5, their most powerful model yet, with enhanced intelligence, better sustained work on long tasks, and improved instruction following; they are doubling included usage for a week.
@elonmusk: Try it out! (Partially trained on Colossus 2)
Cursor announces Composer 2.5, an upgraded AI model for coding that is more intelligent and reliable, partially trained on Colossus 2. Usage is doubled for the next week.
under 2% quality gap but 10x cost difference: tested 5 models on identical tool calling tasks[D]
A developer tested five AI models on tool calling tasks and found that cheaper models perform within 2% of expensive models like Opus, with Tencent's Hunyuan under $1.50 vs Opus's $15, leading to a daily cost reduction from $40 to $9 by routing simpler tasks to cheaper models.