Do you guys actually think AI agents can replace people for bigger tasks anytime soon?

Not talking about small stuff like summarizing notes or drafting emails. I mean real work: * managing projects * handling operations * coordinating across tools * doing research end-to-end * dealing with messy real-world situations Because honestly my experience has been all over the place lol Tools like ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Cursor, n8n and similar stuff have made individual tasks insanely faster. I can build workflows now in a few hours that used to take days. But the moment things become long-running and messy, cracks start showing up. Context drifts Agents skip steps Sessions expire One weird API response breaks the flow A browser page half-loads and now the agent thinks the task is done I was experimenting with some browser-heavy workflows recently and realized the hardest part wasn’t even reasoning. It was reliability. Stuff like Browser Use and hyperbrowser honestly mattered more than prompt tweaking because unstable environments were causing most of the failures. That’s why I keep wondering if the future is less about replacing people entirely and more about agents handling narrow repetitive work while humans handle judgment, edge cases, and coordination. The most useful systems I’ve seen so far are usually: * tightly scoped * supervised * boring operational tasks * really good at one annoying workflow Not autonomous digital employees running entire departments lol Curious where everyone else stands on this. Do you think agents eventually handle bigger end-to-end work reliably, or are we underestimating how much human coordination actually matters?