慢性踝关节不稳中的自适应步态生物反馈:基于留一被试建模与被试特异性模型更新
摘要
该研究评估了一种用于慢性踝关节不稳的自适应步态生物反馈系统,采用时间卷积分类器和留一被试交叉验证(AUROC 0.948),并结合被试特异性模型更新;结果显示自适应组在额状面踝关节角度上较对照组有显著改善。
arXiv:2610.07428v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Adaptive gait biofeedback may support repeated practice in chronic ankle instability, but its evaluation must address model performance and human response. We evaluated a temporal convolutional classifier on protocol-defined, angle-derived GOOD/BAD gait-cycle labels using participant-held-out leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) cross-validation in 20 participants. Seven participants in the adaptive-intervention group completed nine sessions over three weeks, with one motion-capture recording analyzed per session. Models updated after failed sessions were compared offline with their parent models on the same-session validation subset used for candidate selection and the first subsequent adaptive-session recording. Frontal-plane ankle angle was compared between the adaptive group and 10 sequentially enrolled controls at Baseline, Post, and 7-day Retention. Across 20 held-out folds, mean fold-level area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.948, sensitivity for angle-threshold-exceeding BAD cycles was 0.941, and specificity for angle-threshold-meeting GOOD cycles was 0.366. Mean BAD-class F1 was higher in candidate models by 0.187 on the same-session subset and 0.118 on the first subsequent recording. At Post, the adaptive group had a baseline-adjusted frontal-plane ankle angle 5.168 degrees lower than controls (95% confidence interval, 1.766-8.569 degrees lower); the Retention contrast was uncertain. These findings characterize population-model discrimination and offline participant-specific updating during repeated biofeedback use, alongside a nonrandomized Post frontal-plane ankle angle association. They do not establish independent clinical gait classification or a causal benefit of updating.
查看缓存全文
缓存时间: 2026/10/08 12:27
# Adaptive Gait Biofeedback With Participant-Held-Out Modeling and Participant-Specific Updating in Chronic Ankle Instability Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07428](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07428) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.07428) > Abstract:Adaptive gait biofeedback may support repeated practice in chronic ankle instability, but its evaluation must address model performance and human response\. We evaluated a temporal convolutional classifier on protocol\-defined, angle\-derived GOOD/BAD gait\-cycle labels using participant\-held\-out leave\-one\-subject\-out \(LOSO\) cross\-validation in 20 participants\. Seven participants in the adaptive\-intervention group completed nine sessions over three weeks, with one motion\-capture recording analyzed per session\. Models updated after failed sessions were compared offline with their parent models on the same\-session validation subset used for candidate selection and the first subsequent adaptive\-session recording\. Frontal\-plane ankle angle was compared between the adaptive group and 10 sequentially enrolled controls at Baseline, Post, and 7\-day Retention\. Across 20 held\-out folds, mean fold\-level area under the receiver operating characteristic curve \(AUROC\) was 0\.948, sensitivity for angle\-threshold\-exceeding BAD cycles was 0\.941, and specificity for angle\-threshold\-meeting GOOD cycles was 0\.366\. Mean BAD\-class F1 was higher in candidate models by 0\.187 on the same\-session subset and 0\.118 on the first subsequent recording\. At Post, the adaptive group had a baseline\-adjusted frontal\-plane ankle angle 5\.168 degrees lower than controls \(95% confidence interval, 1\.766\-8\.569 degrees lower\); the Retention contrast was uncertain\. These findings characterize population\-model discrimination and offline participant\-specific updating during repeated biofeedback use, alongside a nonrandomized Post frontal\-plane ankle angle association\. They do not establish independent clinical gait classification or a causal benefit of updating\. ## Submission history From: Jaeyoon Kim \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/0670c4f8/2610.07428)\] **\[v1\]**Mon, 5 Oct 2026 21:36:48 UTC \(1,679 KB\)
相似文章
GaitVista:面向无障碍纵向步态评估的可靠性感知AI测量
GaitVista是一个可靠性感知的AI测量层,它使用轻量级门控机制,从摄像头和惯性传感器数据中分配关节特定的视觉贡献,以减少错误并提高在无障碍环境中纵向步态评估的准确性。
一种紧凑的步态索引前后压力中心表示,用于基于足底垂直地面反作用力的帕金森病分类
本文提出了一种紧凑的步态索引前后压力中心表示,该表示基于足底垂直地面反作用力数据,用于帕金森病分类,在机器学习评估中取得了比现有方法更高的准确性。
自适应数据选择改善低基线性能下的可穿戴预测
本文评估了可穿戴健康预测中的自适应数据选择策略,发现该方法显著提升了低基线性能参与者的AUROC,但对强基线参与者改善有限。
面向序贯筛选的历史特征残差适配
该论文提出采集时残差自适应方法,在固定实验预算下保留可复用的基础打分器并学习排名修正,使 20 个测试筛选任务的命中回收率从 22.58% 提升至 28.61%(相对提升 26.7%),并优于多种对照方法。
基于GRF的多类步态障碍分类3D数字孪生可视化
论文提出了一个集成框架,用于使用双侧GRF和COP信号进行多类步态障碍分类,结合3D可视化和可解释AI,实现了高准确率。