Breville Eye Q Toaster Review: Neat Sensors, but Less-Than-Perfect Toast

Wired Products

Summary

Breville's Eye Q toaster uses optical sensors to measure toast doneness, but a Wired review finds its toasting quality merely comparable to regular toasters, with uneven results and some unit inconsistency.

The Breville Eye Q uses optical sensors to measure the darkness of your toast. Cool tech, but the toasting quality needs improvement.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 10/14/26, 12:42 PM

# Breville’s New Toaster Uses Optical Sensors to Measure Your Toast’s Doneness Source: [https://www.wired.com/review/breville-eye-q-toaster/](https://www.wired.com/review/breville-eye-q-toaster/) It's also pretty good looking as countertop appliances go, a bar that Breville's products tend to clear easily\. The “dark noir” brushed steel is handsome, the controls intuitive, and the ceramic\-coated top is clean and will likely stay that way over time, more so than a traditional stainless top\. Over the summer, I brought the Eye Q along for a couple of weeks of family time in New Hampshire, where we were often eight or more around the table, tweens to octogenarians\. Most everyone was intrigued by the toaster, and encouragingly, nobody needed coaching on how to use it\. During the months I had it, it almost always did an acceptable job\. It wasn't hard to get the toast right, but—and this is a big but—compared to a regular toaster, the quality of the toast it made was comparable, not superior\. To generalize, especially if you compared front to back on a slice, or piece to piece, the Eye Q's toasting was a little uneven and the top of the toast tended to come out darker than the bottom\. A noticeable thing, but nothing a polite person would complain about if you set a couple buttery slices in front of them\. On BLT day, I took my nephew Eli on as intern for the afternoon and had him toast seven consecutively darker batches of toast, one per setting, then line them up in order on a sheet pan\. The lowest setting was very light, settings two and three were pretty identical, settings four and five were excellent, setting six was mysteriously lighter than setting four, and setting seven was very dark and a little burnt\. Two\-slot toasters aren't designed for seven back\-to\-back cycles of toasting, but it did well enough\. Store\-bought bagels didn't fare particularly well\. Back in Seattle, I unpacked a new Eye Q, and that one had a bad habit of making lighter shades darker than most people would appreciate, so Breville sent another one along to close out the testing\. It worked fine, though it tended to get the edges a little toastier than the center; this seemed to be getting worse as testing wound down, so if you’re thinking about buying one of these, perhaps watch the comments for a couple months before pulling the trigger\.

Similar Articles

My brief romance with an AI bird feeder

The Verge

A Verge writer reviews the $269 Kiwibit Bird Feeder 2 Pro, describing how its AI bird identification and 4K HDR video initially delighted them before the device's flaws soured the experience.

Boox’s quirky page-turning remote won me over

The Verge

The article reviews Boox's new Tappy wireless page-turning remote for e-readers, highlighting its quirky retro typewriter design, satisfying button feel, and included customization options, though noting it's less ergonomic than the Kobo Remote.

Qwen 3.8 27b just feels… ok?

Reddit r/LocalLLaMA

A software developer shares a skeptical review of Qwen 3.8 27b running locally on 32GB VRAM via Unsloth's Q6 quantization, arguing that benchmarks and online hype overstate the model's real-world coding ability. They report frequent thinking loops, degraded quality with the Swift 1.5 finetune, and a perceived disconnect between public sentiment and actual model effectiveness.