@seclink: Accused of 'Copying Code': Li Bojie (former Huawei 'Genius Youth', now Chief Scientist at Pine AI) was taking a remote interview with DeepSeek. Due to his habit of using a dual-screen setup, he occasionally glanced at the secondary screen on the left. The interviewer directly accused him of 'copying code' and demanded he prove his innocence, or the interview could not continue. The candidate's response…

X AI KOLs Timeline News

Summary

Li Bojie, former Huawei 'Genius Youth', was accused of plagiarism by the interviewer for using a dual-screen setup during a remote interview with DeepSeek. He immediately terminated the interview and publicly criticized the interview process and lack of respect.

Accused of 'Copying Code': Li Bojie (former Huawei 'Genius Youth', now Chief Scientist at Pine AI) was taking a remote interview with DeepSeek. Due to his habit of using a dual-screen setup, he occasionally glanced at the secondary screen on the left. The interviewer directly accused him of 'copying code' and demanded he prove his innocence, or the interview could not continue. Candidate's response: Li Bojie believed the accusation lacked factual basis and was extremely unprofessional and disrespectful. He terminated the interview on the spot and posted on social media complaining about DeepSeek's interview process, including tardiness, slow feedback, and the offensive accusation. Public opinion characterization: This was not an accusation of academic or code plagiarism by Li Bojie, but rather a misunderstanding caused by 'dual-screen gaze deviation' during a remote interview and a hasty conclusion by the interviewer. There is currently no evidence that Li Bojie engaged in plagiarism.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 07/07/26, 09:26 AM

Accused of “Copying Code”: Li Bojie (former Huawei “Genius Youth”, now Chief Scientist at Pine AI) attended a remote interview with DeepSeek. As he is accustomed to working with dual monitors, his gaze occasionally shifted toward the secondary screen on his left.

The interviewer directly accused him of “copying code” and demanded that he prove his innocence, or the interview could not proceed.

The interviewee’s response: Li Bojie considered the accusation baseless and extremely disrespectful of professional standards. He terminated the interview on the spot and later posted on social media about DeepSeek’s interview process, including lateness, slow feedback, and this offensive accusation.

Public opinion characterization: This is not an accusation of academic or code plagiarism against Li Bojie, but rather a misunderstanding caused by “gaze deviation towards a secondary screen” during a remote interview, combined with a hasty judgment made unilaterally by the interviewer.

As of now, there is no evidence whatsoever that Li Bojie engaged in plagiarism.

Similar Articles

@Phoenixyin13: DeepSeek is getting a bit carried away in the talent war. In 2026, AI talent is extremely scarce, especially compound talents like Li Bojie who have both top conference papers and engineering experience at a major company like Huawei. If I were the interviewer, I would treat them like treasure. Yet it ended up like this – a typical case of immature processes combined with uneven interviewer quality. In the current AI circle, …

X AI KOLs Timeline

Criticizes DeepSeek's improper interview process, missing out on compound AI talent like Li Bojie, reflecting issues in corporate recruitment processes amid the current AI talent war.

@faiford: A programmer with an annual salary of $385,000, accustomed to vibe coding, refused to use Claude Code during an interview at top quant firm Jane Street, and was immediately disqualified. The raw 32-minute live coding interview footage was released unedited, truthfully recording everything from live coding, Q&A, to tool compatibility issues.

X AI KOLs Timeline

A programmer earning $385,000 per year failed his interview at Jane Street for refusing to use Claude Code, reflecting that AI tools have become industry entry standards. On Polymarket, there are bets on the penetration speed of AI tools.

@mubeitech: Kicked out of an Ivy League school, Roy Lee landed $5 M in 24 h. He cracked Silicon Valley’s playbook with Interview Coder—software built to cheat in tech interviews—and proved it by breezing through an Amazon internship round, then posted the whole stunt online.

X AI KOLs Timeline

Roy Lee raised $5 million in 24 hours for Interview Coder, a tool engineered to cheat in coding interviews, after demonstrating it by passing an Amazon internship interview and publishing the recording.

@blanplan: https://x.com/blanplan/status/2056614589236998459

X AI KOLs Timeline

DeepSeek's job description analysis for the 'Agent Harness R&D Engineer' position reveals the company's pursuit of a 'researcher + engineer + community operations' triple-threat talent, as well as its in-depth usage requirements for AI Agent tools.