Court Records Should Be Free

Hacker News Top News

Summary

The Open Courts Act of 2026 would eliminate PACER fees and modernize federal court electronic filing systems to improve public access and cybersecurity. The article argues that court records belong to the public and should not be behind a paywall.

No content available
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 06/20/26, 02:26 PM

# Court Records Should Be Free Source: [https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/06/court-records-should-be-free](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/06/court-records-should-be-free) Court records belong to the public\. Yet anyone seeking access to federal court filings through PACER, a government software system that stands for Public Access to Court Electronic Records, is usually required to pay hefty fees to search for and view documents\. PACER’s fees have long acted as a barrier that makes it hard, especially for low income people, to see and understand the work produced by our own public servants\. That's why EFF[joined a broad group of organizations](https://fixthecourt.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Group-letter-on-the-Open-Courts-Act-6.15.26.pdf)supporting the Open Courts Act of 2026, legislation that would modernize the federal courts' electronic filing systems and eliminate PACER fees\. The bill would replace the aging PACER and[CM/ECF](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CM/ECF)systems with a modern, unified platform designed to improve public access, strengthen cybersecurity, and reduce long\-term costs\. Supporters note that PACER currently collects more than $150 million annually in fees from the public, despite court records being public documents\. The Open Courts Act would also make court records easier to find, access, and understand\. The legislation builds on a[similar proposal](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/09/end-pacer-paywall), also supported by EFF, that previously won bipartisan support in the Senate Judiciary Committee but did not become law before the end of the congressional session\. This is not a new issue for EFF\. More than a decade ago,[we criticized PACER's paywalls](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/09/right-know-pacer-mess-and-how-clean-it)and the removal of some court records from online access, arguing that the public should not have to pay to read the law and the judicial decisions that shape it\. The Open Courts Act would move U\.S\. courts a big step closer to that goal\. In addition to EFF, the bill is supported by[Fix the Court](https://fixthecourt.com/), the group pushing this bill forward; the[Free Law Project](https://free.law/), which maintains RECAP, software that has created a large archive of legal opinions and other court records; as well as civil society groups, open government watchdogs, and media groups\. Public access to the courts is a cornerstone of democratic accountability\. Let’s[eliminate unnecessary barriers to court records](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/09/end-pacer-paywall), and bring the federal judiciary’s tech into the modern era\. - Read the[full letter](https://fixthecourt.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Group-letter-on-the-Open-Courts-Act-6.15.26.pdf)supporting the Open Courts Act of 2026

Similar Articles

A Call to Action: Stop the FCC's KYC Regime

Hacker News Top

The article argues against the FCC's proposed Know Your Customer (KYC) rules for phone service, claiming they would create a surveillance regime that harms privacy and fails to stop determined criminals, while urging public action to oppose the regulation.