@0xLogicrw: Alibaba Tongyi Lab launches Agent Evaluation Benchmark PawBench v1.0, for the first time integrating base models and runtime frameworks into a unified evaluation system. The evaluation cross-tests 9 large models with three frameworks: Hermes, OpenClaw, and QwenPaw, covering 150 real-world tasks and 4050 ...
Summary
Alibaba Tongyi Lab launches Agent Evaluation Benchmark PawBench v1.0, for the first time integrating base models and runtime frameworks into a unified evaluation system, covering 9 models and 3 frameworks with 150 tasks. It finds that framework design significantly affects agent performance, and proposes four design principles.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/05/26, 03:15 PM
Alibaba Tongyi Lab has released the agent evaluation benchmark PawBench v1.0, which for the first time integrates foundation models and execution frameworks into a unified evaluation system. The benchmark performs cross-testing on 9 large models and three frameworks—Hermes, OpenClaw, and QwenPaw—covering 150 real-world tasks and 4,050 test units.
Results show that the design of the execution framework directly determines whether agent capabilities can be reliably deployed. Under the same model, the three frameworks exhibit significant performance gaps: QwenPaw scores 76.4, OpenClaw scores 75.4, while Hermes trails at only 70.4. A gap of 6.4 points is comparable to a major model version upgrade.
Excellent design can even enable smaller models to “punch above their weight”: on the Hermes framework, GLM 5.1 scores only 68.2, while on QwenPaw, the smaller Qwen3.6-35b-a3b achieves 70.4.
Analysis of execution traces reveals that the performance differences stem from a lack of substantive validation of workspace artifacts, loose tool-path constraints, and overly large tool tables that increase the model’s decision-making burden. Most frameworks also show clear shortcomings in proactive discovery of local specialized skills and zero-configuration availability of web search.
The evaluation team proposes four fundamental principles for framework design:
- Inform Fully – Clearly define context such as cwd and workspace.
- Equip on Demand – Control the number of tools and ensure critical tools like password-free search are available by default.
- Monitor Actively – Validate whether task artifacts such as file writes are actually realized.
- Recover Gracefully – Provide opportunities for correction and continuation when tools fail or artifacts are missing.
Similar Articles
@Ali_TongyiLab: https://x.com/Ali_TongyiLab/status/2067158015615041755
The AgentScope team introduces PawBench, a benchmark for evaluating the combined performance of models and agent harnesses, analyzing 4,050 test cells to show that harness choice can be as impactful as model upgrades.
RobotWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Robot Use Across Diverse Tasks and Embodiments
RobotWorld 提出了一个涵盖 84 项任务的机器人智能体仿真基准,横跨操作、移动操作、运动、驾驶与空中控制,用于评估多模态智能体将数字任务能力迁移到物理世界的表现,并揭示了模型间的能力差异与关键短板。
EmbodiedLab: Benchmarking Embodied Agents That Act to Know
EmbodiedLab 是一个面向“以行动求知”具身智能体的新基准,要求机器人在物理仿真实验室中自主设计实验、操作仪器以发现科学原理。在 5 个学科、30 项实验、14 种装置平台上评测六个前沿模型,结果显示即使最强的智能体成功率也不足一半,失败主要源于与装置的物理交互。
@RookieRicardoR: Domestic models break through again, matching top models like Claude 4.6 and Gemini 3.1 Pro. Just tested Qwen3.7-Max, sharing some real thoughts. Last night I topped up as soon as the API went live and chose three tasks (see video) to test Qwen3.7-Max's frontend capabilities…
The user tested Qwen3.7-Max and believes it matches top models like Claude 4.6 and Gemini 3.1 Pro in frontend, computing power, and Agent capabilities. Its reasoning ability has significantly improved, and with monthly iteration speed, it has become a first-tier domestic model.
HumanoidToolBench: Benchmarking Humanoid Tool Use from Selection to Mobile Execution
HumanoidToolBench 提出一个18项任务的基准,评估人形机器人从工具选择到移动执行的能力,并发布包含3.1k条演示的 ToolBook 数据集(仿真与真实 Unitree G1 采集),揭示了工具选择与任务成功执行之间的显著差距。