When Bots Join the Team: Bot Adoption and the Institutional Fabric of Open-Source Software Projects
Summary
This paper studies the impact of bot adoption on open-source software projects, finding that after adopting bots, projects show more repeated collaboration, fewer conflict cascades, and more distinctive outputs, suggesting bots can strengthen social infrastructure.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/16/26, 04:24 AM
# When Bots Join the Team: Bot Adoption and the Institutional Fabric of Open-Source Software Projects Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.13679](https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.13679) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.13679) > Abstract:AI agents are joining human teams, raising a basic question: when an automated agent becomes a regular participant, does group organization strengthen or weaken? We study this question in open\-source software, where bots open pull requests, review code, and merge changes alongside people, leaving a public record of every interaction\. Treating bots as participants rather than tools, we examine 2,991 GitHub projects for two years before and after each adopted its first bot\. We measure three capabilities that institutional theory links to durable coordination \- repeated engagement, social memory, and role differentiation \- and two outcomes: conflict cascades and output distinctiveness\. Bot adoption is followed by more repeated collaboration, greater recognition of specific bots in discussion, fewer conflict cascades, and more distinctive outputs\. These changes cluster around adoption rather than accumulating gradually\. Because we lack an untreated comparison group, we interpret the results as precisely timed associations, not causal effects\. Two patterns are difficult for alternative explanations to account for: capabilities predict outcomes according to their function \- coordination versus differentiation \- rather than whether humans or bots provide them, and human\-side capabilities account for the bot\-conflict association but not the bot\-distinctiveness association\. The findings are consistent with a specific interpretation: predictable, rule\-based agents can become part of a community's social infrastructure\. The bot is the occasion; social organization is the mechanism\. ## Submission history From: Yongren Shi \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/e5939313/2607.13679)\] **\[v1\]**Wed, 15 Jul 2026 10:21:52 UTC \(572 KB\)
Similar Articles
@bot: Introducing Team Bots, shared AI teammates that learn as your team works with them. Give your Team Bot the skills, plug…
Team Bots are shared AI teammates that learn from team workflows and can be customized with skills, plugins, and credentials for integration into platforms like Slack and Grok Bot.
OpenBot
OpenBot is an open-source, local-first workspace that lets users connect multiple AI agents—Claude, ChatGPT, Grok, OpenCode, or custom ones—across Mac, Windows, and iOS, define roles, delegate tasks, and invite teammates to collaborate live with the same agents.
Team Bots: AI coworkers that learn from your team (5 minute read)
x.ai launches Team Bots, AI-powered bots that learn from team workflows and integrate with tools like Slack, Notion, and Salesforce to automate tasks and enhance collaboration.
GitBot
GitBot is an open-source tool that lets developers build bots using existing coding agents like Claude Code, Codex, or OpenCode, with features for repository automation and community sharing.
Will Open Source Survive the Agents That Replaced It?
The article discusses the future of open-source software in the context of AI agents, questioning whether it will remain relevant or be replaced by these agents.