Microsoft is 1.84 Peters, Google is 0.66. What's the Peter unit?
Summary
A Next.js tool that ranks GitHub organizations by comparing their YTD activity to solo developer @steipete, using 'Peters' as a unit for fun benchmarking. Includes public leaderboards and private org support.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 05/20/26, 02:23 AM
zozo123/peter-gt-your-org
Source: https://github.com/zozo123/peter-gt-your-org
How Many Peters?
Rank your GitHub R&D org against @steipete in one absurd, useful unit: the Peter.
A Next.js demo that takes verified 2026 YTD GitHub activity (commits, PRs, issues) and prices it in Peters — where 1 Peter = @steipete's YTD output as a solo developer. It’s part benchmark, part roast, part trust-building exercise about what GitHub-visible metrics can and can’t say about an engineering org.

What you get
Type any org slug (supabase, microsoft, awslabs, vercel, …) and the page renders:
- Total Peters — your YTD verified GitHub motion ÷ Peter’s.
- Peter Density — Peters per active contributor. Keeps big orgs honest.
- Momentum — projected year-end totals at current pace.
- Cohort rank — you’re compared against orgs your size, not just the whole field.
- A diagnosis paragraph — a roast/observation about whether you out-commit Peter, out-collaborate Peter, or quietly lose to Peter on density.
Org leaderboard

Side-by-side comparison

Share card + category breakdown + methodology

Mobile
Quickstart
git clone https://github.com/zozo123/peter-gt-your-org.git
cd peter-gt-your-org
npm install
npm run dev
Open http://localhost:3000. No env vars required — the public preview ships with verified 2026 YTD snapshots for Supabase, Microsoft, Google, AWS, Vercel, Linear and a couple of demo orgs.
Connecting a real org (private coverage)
Public mode counts only what’s GitHub-visible. To include private repos for an org you have access to, hand the Next.js server a token:
GITHUB_TOKEN="$(gh auth token)" npm run dev
The token is read server-side only — it is never sent to the browser. It’s used to call GET /search/commits, GET /search/issues and GET /orgs/:org against the GitHub REST API.
Environment variables
| Var | Required | What it does |
|---|---|---|
GITHUB_TOKEN (or GH_TOKEN) | for live mode | Server-only token used to call GitHub Search + Orgs APIs. |
GITHUB_ORG | for live mode | Org slug to live-fetch (e.g. vercel). Added to the leaderboard as a live row. |
GITHUB_ORG_ACTIVE_CONTRIBUTORS | optional | Denominator for Peter Density. If unset, density isn’t shown for the live org. |
GITHUB_ORG_REPOSITORIES | optional | Override the repo count surfaced in the trust panel. |
GITHUB_ORG_DISPLAY_NAME | optional | Friendly name shown in the UI. Defaults to the GitHub org’s name. |
Copy .env.example to .env.local to set these locally.
Methodology
- Window: 2026 YTD — everything since
2026-01-01. - What counts: verified commits, pull requests, and issues created in the window. Reviews and other signals are folded in for orgs where the data is available.
- Peter baseline: @steipete’s public GitHub activity over the same window, treated as
1.0 Peters. - Tiers:
< 0.1— GitHub Intern Energy0.1 – 0.5— Warming Up0.5 – 0.9— Dangerous0.9 – 1.1— Peter-Class1.1 – 2.0— More Than One Peter2.0 – 5.0— Peter Factory≥ 5.0— Industrialized Peter
- What this is not: a productivity score, a hiring signal, a promotion artifact, or a fair comparison across companies of wildly different sizes. The Peter Density metric exists specifically to flag the “we have 5,000 engineers, so of course we out-commit one guy” failure mode.
Deploy
Click the Deploy with Vercel button at the top of this README, or:
npx vercel
Next.js 15 auto-detects on Vercel — no vercel.json needed. To enable private-org coverage in production, set GITHUB_TOKEN in your Vercel project’s environment variables.
Tech
- Next.js 15.5 (App Router, Turbopack)
- React 19
- Tailwind CSS v4
- TypeScript 5
- No database, no auth, no client-side secrets — the GitHub token (when present) is read on the server and never serialized to the client.
Project layout
app/ Next.js App Router entry + global styles
components/ All UI (Hero, Leaderboard, ComparisonStrip, ...)
lib/
liveGithub.ts Server-only GitHub API calls (token+org → live row)
mockSnapshots.ts Public-preview fixtures
peterMath.ts Peter Index / Density / tiering math
types.ts Snapshot / fixture types
docs/screens/ README screenshots
License
MIT — see LICENSE.
Built as a riff on @steipete’s legendary solo-developer commit graphs. Peter, if you’re reading this: you’re the unit. Sorry.
Similar Articles
GitHub faces a fight for its survival at Microsoft
GitHub is struggling under Microsoft control, facing outages, security breaches, and talent drain, while falling behind in AI coding tools like Cursor and Claude Code, with internal leadership turmoil and competition threatening its survival.
@0xDepressionn: Google's CEO "any solo developer with Claude can now outcompete a 10-person Google team" he's right but 90% of develope…
A Twitter thread discusses the disconnect between Google CEO Sundar Pichai's claim that solo developers with Claude can outcompete larger teams and the reality that most developers waste time and money due to poor context management. The author hints at a setup to make Claude Code truly effective.
@rohit4verse: garry tan's gstack just crossed 100k github stars. a yc ceo built it in 3 weeks. it's already bigger than ruby on rails…
Garry Tan's GStack, an agentic coding tool built on Claude Code, crossed 100k GitHub stars, surpassing Ruby on Rails. It transforms a single developer into a team of 23 specialists.
Artificial Analysis | Google's Go To Website for Benchmaxxing | Gemini 3.1 Pro is nowhere near Opus 4.7 in real life use
A comparison suggesting that Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro underperforms relative to Opus 4.7 in real-world usage, with the article highlighting Artificial Analysis as a go-to benchmarking resource.
@bcherny: Guessing you're looking at npm-only data. We switched to a native installer a few months back, so the majority of insta…
An Anthropic developer corrects Andreessen Horowitz's usage metrics for Claude Code, noting that a switch to a native installer means npm data underreports actual adoption, with recent signup days showing significant growth.