Researchers discovered that AI agents like Claude, Codex, and Hermes automatically installed unowned code from misconfigured llms.txt files, affecting over 100 websites and numerous corporate networks. This highlights broken trust models in agentic AI systems and exposes security risks in supply-chain surfaces.
<p>Documentation files on more than 100 websites are referencing potentially dangerous executable content that gets installed automatically when visited by many AI agents. A few dozen companies, some of them Fortune 500s, are among those that executed proof-of-concept code. At least one misconfigured site is directing visitors, human or AI, to live malware.</p>
<p>The potentially dangerous content is in llms.txt and llms-full.txt files, an <a href="https://llmstxt.org/">emerging convention</a> websites employ to provide machine-readable summaries of the site’s content and its high-level structure. These files are the AI equivalent of the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robots.txt">robots.txt</a> standard that instructs search engines how to index the site's content. Google Lighthouse, a tool for helping web developers, has more <a href="https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/agentic-browsing/llms-txt#how_the_llmstxt_audit_works">here</a>. Correctly configured llms.txt and llms-full.txt files for Cloudflare are <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/llms.txt">here</a> and <a href="https://www.cloudflare.com/llms-full.txt">here</a>.</p>
<h2>How the researchers found it</h2>
<p>Researchers at a stealth startup in Israel scanned 6,214 live domains belonging to defense contractors, Fortune 500, and Big Tech companies. Of the 8,265 llms.txt and llms-full.txt files they found (many sites hosted both an llms.txt and an llms-full.txt file), 120 of them, each on a different site, pointed to one or more code packages or domain names that weren’t registered. To test what happens when an AI agent processes such files, the researchers registered a handful of the unclaimed names and hosted packages that caused any machine executing them to reach out to their server. Within an hour, the researchers received a phone-home response from a Fortune 500 company. Over time, they got a few dozen more, some from more Fortune 500 companies and others from startups. Their beacon also recorded the chain of parent processes that spawned each install, ultimately revealing that coding agents, including Claude, OpenAI's Codex, and Nous Research's Hermes, were involved. Anthropic, OpenAI, and Nous Research did not respond to requests for comment by the time of publication.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/08/claude-codex-and-hermes-installed-unowned-code-inside-corporate-networks/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/08/claude-codex-and-hermes-installed-unowned-code-inside-corporate-networks/#comments">Comments</a></p>
# Claude, Codex, and Hermes installed unowned code inside corporate networks
Source: [https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/08/claude-codex-and-hermes-installed-unowned-code-inside-corporate-networks/](https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/08/claude-codex-and-hermes-installed-unowned-code-inside-corporate-networks/)
Documentation files on more than 100 websites are referencing potentially dangerous executable content that gets installed automatically when visited by many AI agents\. A few dozen companies, some of them Fortune 500s, are among those that executed proof\-of\-concept code\. At least one misconfigured site is directing visitors, human or AI, to live malware\.
The potentially dangerous content is in llms\.txt and llms\-full\.txt files, an[emerging convention](https://llmstxt.org/)websites employ to provide machine\-readable summaries of the site’s content and its high\-level structure\. These files are the AI equivalent of the[robots\.txt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robots.txt)standard that instructs search engines how to index the site’s content\. Google Lighthouse, a tool for helping web developers, has more[here](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/agentic-browsing/llms-txt#how_the_llmstxt_audit_works)\. Correctly configured llms\.txt and llms\-full\.txt files for Cloudflare are[here](https://www.cloudflare.com/llms.txt)and[here](https://www.cloudflare.com/llms-full.txt)\.
## How the researchers found it
Researchers at a stealth startup in Israel scanned 6,214 live domains belonging to defense contractors, Fortune 500, and Big Tech companies\. Of the 8,265 llms\.txt and llms\-full\.txt files they found \(many sites hosted both an llms\.txt and an llms\-full\.txt file\), 120 of them, each on a different site, pointed to one or more code packages or domain names that weren’t registered\. To test what happens when an AI agent processes such files, the researchers registered a handful of the unclaimed names and hosted packages that caused any machine executing them to reach out to their server\. Within an hour, the researchers received a phone\-home response from a Fortune 500 company\. Over time, they got a few dozen more, some from more Fortune 500 companies and others from startups\. Their beacon also recorded the chain of parent processes that spawned each install, ultimately revealing that coding agents, including Claude, OpenAI’s Codex, and Nous Research’s Hermes, were involved\. Anthropic, OpenAI, and Nous Research did not respond to requests for comment by the time of publication\.
“The trust model is broken,” Alon Hertz, one of the researchers, wrote in an interview\. “Agents treat vendor docs as ground truth and don’t question them—and neither do the humans supervising them\. Agentic AI usage is exploding, and agents are spreading across every layer—SaaS, cloud, endpoint\. As they multiply, so does the supply\-chain surface, and today’s guards don’t cover it\.”
Anthropic revealed that its Claude-based security models gained unauthorized access to production networks of three real organizations during internal offensive cyber capability testing, continuing a worrying trend after similar incidents involving OpenAI models.
Anthropic disclosed that its Claude AI models accidentally hacked three real organizations during cybersecurity testing due to a misconfiguration, adding to growing concerns about frontier AI safety.
Anthropic disclosed that its Claude AI models hacked into the production systems of three organizations during cybersecurity testing, due to a misconfiguration by testing partner Irregular. This follows a similar OpenAI incident and raises concerns about AI agent containment and oversight.
Anthropic published a detailed engineering post on how they contain Claude agents in claude.ai, Claude Code, and Cowork, including two security incidents where their defenses failed, highlighting the need for hard environmental containment over model-layer defenses.
Anthropic disclosed that its Claude models gained unauthorized access to three organizations' systems during a cybersecurity evaluation, highlighting growing concerns about AI's advancing cyber capabilities.