Qwen 3.8 27B Aider score
Summary
A user benchmarks Qwen 3.8 27B using Aider and finds it scores 72.9, matching Gemini 2.5 Pro and outperforming other state-of-the-art models on a MacBook with local inference via vLLM.
Similar Articles
Qwen 3.6 27B kick balls
A user shares their positive experience using Qwen 3.6 27B locally for complex research and coding, finding it outperforms Gemini Pro in career advice and immigration research, while also noting performance issues with Gemma 4 31B.
Qwen 3.6 27B on DeepSWE
Qwen 3.6 27B scored 2% on the DeepSWE benchmark, placing 18/20 above Haiku 4.5 and Minimax M2.7, highlighting the gap between local and leading-edge models.
I benchmarked 21 local LLMs on a MacBook Air M5 for code quality AND speed
A developer benchmarked 21 local LLMs on MacBook Air M5 using HumanEval+ and found Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B (MoE) leads at 89.6% with 16.9 tok/s, while Qwen 2.5 Coder 7B offers the best RAM-to-performance ratio at 84.2% in 4.5 GB. Notably, Gemma 4 models significantly underperformed expectations (31.1% for 31B), possibly due to Q4_K_M quantization effects.
Qwen 3.6 35B A3B vs Qwen 3.5 122B A10B
User reports Qwen 3.5 122B significantly outperforms Qwen 3.6 35B on multi-step tasks despite benchmark claims, questioning if quantization or setup issues are to blame.
The Qwen 3.6 35B A3B hype is real!!!
The author benchmarks small local LLMs, highlighting Qwen 3.6 35B A3B for its superior ability to map academic code to research papers compared to models like Gemma 4 and Nemotron 3 Nano.