@rohanpaul_ai: Fable 5 absolutely crushed the HTML5 physics contest, but cost 6x more than Opus 4.8 and 39× more than GLM 5.2 in that …
Summary
A comparison of four AI models (Fable 5, Opus 4.8, GLM 5.2, GPT 5.5) on generating HTML5 canvas physics demos shows Fable 5 outperforms others in quality but costs significantly more per test.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/02/26, 12:14 AM
Fable 5 absolutely crushed the HTML5 physics contest, but cost 6x more than Opus 4.8 and 39× more than GLM 5.2 in that test.
Test was done on atomic[.]chat, a desktop app that runs LLMs locally.
The test asked 4 models to generate self-contained canvas demos with believable motion and collisions.
The scenes were not simple animations because every crash needed gravity, force, timing, and contact handling.
Outputs:
- Fable 5: 62,158 tokens, $3.12
- GPT 5.5: 37,753 tokens, $1.14
- Opus 4.8: 22,280 tokens, $0.56
- GLM 5.2: 36,246 tokens, $0.08
atomic.chat (@atomic_chat_hq): Fable 5 totally crushed our new contest, but it cost 6x more than Opus 4.8!
We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos
Prompts: — A train derailing off a broken bridge into the water — Two cars jumping off ramps and
Similar Articles
@FinanceYF5: Same task to 4 models: Fable 5 sweeps, but costs 6x more than Opus 4.8. Task: 3 HTML5 physics scenes – broken bridge derailment, canyon collision, monster truck. Fable 5: $3.12, A+, no clipping. GPT 5.5: $1.14, closest to Fable. Opus…
Compares the performance and cost of four AI models (Fable 5, GPT 5.5, Opus 4.8, GLM 5.2) on three HTML5 physics scene tasks. Fable 5 delivers the best quality but costs nearly 6x more than Opus; quality and price are not yet both attainable.
@rohanpaul_ai: GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra vs GPT-5.5 In a surprising HTML5 physics test demo Atomic Chat found GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra is 3X more exp…
A physics test by Atomic Chat shows GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra is three times more expensive than GPT-5.5 with no clear advantage in HTML5 canvas physics demos, highlighting weaknesses in physics simulation despite higher cost.
Opus 5 outperformed Fable 5 in 3D destruction physics
Opus 5 outperformed Fable 5 in benchmarks for 3D destruction physics.
@rohanpaul_ai: Qwen 3.8 Max just built better 3D physics scenes than Fable 5 while costing about 7x less to run. Test was done by @ato…
A test by atomic.chat shows Qwen 3.8 Max outperforming Fable 5 at generating self-contained 3D physics scenes while costing about 7x less per run.
@PrajwalTomar_: WAIT. Anthropic just proved you don't need Fable 5 for everything. With their own benchmarks. They tested "Fable 5 orch…
Anthropic benchmark shows that using a larger model (Fable) as orchestrator with cheaper models (Sonnet) as workers achieves 96% of full Fable performance at 46% cost, available now in Claude Code.