@FinanceYF5: Same task to 4 models: Fable 5 sweeps, but costs 6x more than Opus 4.8. Task: 3 HTML5 physics scenes – broken bridge derailment, canyon collision, monster truck. Fable 5: $3.12, A+, no clipping. GPT 5.5: $1.14, closest to Fable. Opus…
Summary
Compares the performance and cost of four AI models (Fable 5, GPT 5.5, Opus 4.8, GLM 5.2) on three HTML5 physics scene tasks. Fable 5 delivers the best quality but costs nearly 6x more than Opus; quality and price are not yet both attainable.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/02/26, 08:18 AM
Given the same task to 4 models, Fable 5 wins all, but costs 6 times more than Opus 4.8
Task: 3 HTML5 physics scenes: broken bridge derailment, canyon collision, monster truck
Fable 5: $3.12, A+, no clipping GPT 5.5: $1.14, closest to Fable Opus 4.8: $0.56, average results GLM 5.2: $0.08, cheapest, didn’t win a single round
Quality and price still can’t have both. Which would you choose? https://t.co/kljY7cgDB7
Similar Articles
@rohanpaul_ai: Fable 5 absolutely crushed the HTML5 physics contest, but cost 6x more than Opus 4.8 and 39× more than GLM 5.2 in that …
A comparison of four AI models (Fable 5, Opus 4.8, GLM 5.2, GPT 5.5) on generating HTML5 canvas physics demos shows Fable 5 outperforms others in quality but costs significantly more per test.
@seclink: 现在 Fable 5 确实是太贵了 ...
Fable 5 被批评价格过高，而 GLM 5.3 在3D网站设计中表现更优且成本仅为Fable 5的约1/15，突显了AI模型的成本效益比较。
@mylifcc: Jason's comparison of real projects is well-written. Fable 5 indeed shines in complex coding tasks: almost no low-level mistakes, proactively considers edge cases, strictly adheres to the brand system, and can quickly solve tasks in a 13-year-old codebase where GPT has failed multiple times...
User @mylifcc shares their evaluation of Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol on complex coding tasks, believing that Fable 5 has high accuracy but high cost, proposes a hybrid workflow model, sparking discussion on combining model usage.
@FinanceYF5: 1/ Someone ran 3 tasks with Fable 5. The $200 Max membership, 5-hour quota depleted 73%. He said he was stunned. Not because it's expensive — because Opus 4.8 never produced anything like this. A thread explains clearly
A user ran 3 tasks using the Fable 5 model, consuming 73% of the Max membership's 5-hour quota, sparking discussions as Opus 4.8 never consumed resources in this way.
@FinanceYF5: Oh my god... Fable 5 is back, and it's insanely powerful. Someone asked Fable to make a game called 'Super Smart Racing'... With just 4 prompts and $173 worth of tokens, Fable 5 created this game. (Prompts below)
Fable 5 model only used 4 prompts and $173 worth of tokens to create a game called 'Super Smart Racing', demonstrating its extremely strong generative capabilities.