Hyperscalers versus Token Prices
Summary
An analysis of declining token prices for AI models despite new releases like GLM 5.2 and Kimi 2.7, suggesting possible diminishing returns from expensive models.
Similar Articles
Price per 1M tokens is meaningless
This article argues that comparing AI models by price per million tokens is misleading due to differences in tokenizers and token efficiency. It provides a benchmark cost analysis showing that models with higher per-token prices can be cheaper per completed task, with DeepSeek V4 Pro being a strong cost-efficiency outlier.
Why are AI models getting more expensive?
The article discusses the unexpected rise in costs for advanced AI models like Opus 4.7, GPT 5.5, and Gemini 3.5 flash, contrasting with earlier expectations of decreasing prices.
IS GLM 5.2, Kimi 2.7 still worth it?
A discussion questioning whether older AI models like GLM 5.2 and Kimi 2.7 remain relevant for coding now that newer models such as Kimi K3, Qwen 3.8 Max, and DeepSeek V4 Pro are arriving.
Ways to think about token pricing
Benedict Evans analyzes the current instability in AI token pricing, noting a supply crunch and uncertain future as infrastructure investment surges and use cases like software development drive demand. He argues that foundation models may become low-margin commodity providers.
AI Model Pricing Comparison: Input vs. Output Cost per Million Tokens
Bloomberg reports that China's aggressive AI push is creating a 'death zone' for rival US AI model makers, likely driven by intense pricing competition.