超越增益:衡量技能内化以支持智能体技能退役

arXiv cs.AI 论文

摘要

本文提出了一种新方法,用于衡量大语言模型智能体是否已内化公共技能中心中的技能,并指出,基于增益的退役规则无法区分已内化的技能与尚未覆盖的技能。该方法采用基于探测任务的无辅助评分方式,并通过跨模型验证进行检验;同时发布了1,251项技能及其在四个模型上的任务数据。

arXiv:2610.32322v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents retrieve skills from public hubs that hold up to about 100,000 entries and serve many models. As models improve, a hub must find the skills a given model has internalized, meaning it can do without them, and retire them for that model, yet internalization has not been measured with known reliability. Published rules that compare runs with and without a skill retire on the gain alone. The gain is near zero both for an internalized skill and when neither the model nor the skill delivers the capability, a state we call uncovered. We instead withhold the skill, score the model on a task synthesized from it, and trust a high unaided score only when another model gains from the skill, since nearly half of high scores come from tasks no model benefits from. Under four models, a published gain rule applied with one task per skill removes over half of the uncovered skills. On SkillsBench, 28 of its 31 retirements rest on probes no run passed in full, while retiring on the unaided score costs no detectable reward. Unaided verdicts reproduce across tasks more often than the gain rule's (Cohen's kappa 0.42 against 0.23) but differ across models, so a hub must read them per model. We release 1,251 skills with tasks and item scores under four models.
查看原文

相似文章

Particle-1 已在 OpenClaw 中可用

Reddit r/openclaw

Particle-1 是一款面向编程智能体、注重 token 效率的模型(在准确率相当的情况下,输出 token 数比 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 少约 45%),现已在 OpenClaw v2026.10.10 中上线,标准推理采用零数据保留政策。

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next(本地)vs Claude

Reddit r/LocalLLaMA

一位开发者对比了在本地运行 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next(llama-server + ROCm 上的 UD-Q4_K_XL)与在 Claude Code 中使用 Claude Opus 审查同一个真实 Swift 提交的效果:Qwen 产生 8 个发现,零误报,并抓住了 2 个 Claude 遗漏的问题,但漏掉了另外 5 个问题,因此它更适合作为可靠的私密初审工具,而非最终裁决者。