@Miles_Brundage: Makes ya think
Summary
The tweet points out a misperception that independent evaluators and auditors in AI safety aim to substitute for regulatory oversight, which they do not see themselves doing.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 09/16/26, 02:02 PM
Makes ya think https://t.co/2rkwY6QUyA
Nat Purser (@NatPurser): a couple thoughts after chats w/ some non-ai-safety DC friends:
i think there’s a misperception that independent evaluators and auditors imagine themselves to be a solid substitute for regulatory oversight. this is not at all what i’ve encountered.
if anything, many feel
Similar Articles
@NatPurser: a couple thoughts after chats w/ some non-ai-safety DC friends: i think there’s a misperception that independent evalua…
The author discusses a misperception that independent AI safety evaluators aim to replace government oversight, emphasizing their preference for clear regulatory rules and their role as a complement to government efforts.
@Miles_Brundage: Among other things, we need: - auditing to actually be required at the leading companies, with minimum qualification, i…
Miles_Brundage advocates for mandatory auditing and enforceable safety standards for leading AI companies to improve oversight and security.
@Miles_Brundage: One of the reasons I decided to go all in on frontier AI auditing after leaving OpenAI is so that, if AI companies need…
Miles Brundage discusses his move to focus on frontier AI auditing after leaving OpenAI, emphasizing that independent auditors can reassure AI companies that their peers are taking costly safety steps. AVERI supports this, advocating for paced development backed by independent oversight.
@Miles_Brundage: The full comments were significantly better/more constructive than the way they were paraphrased by some folks
A tweet critiques the paraphrasing of AI leaders' comments on regulation, referencing Mike Johnson's opposition to an emergency moratorium and his proposal for meetings with AI providers.
@RepLoriTrahan: .@Fathom_org is right. Bringing in independent evaluators is a real step. But a voluntary commitment can be dropped the…
The article advocates for independent evaluators in AI safety via the FRONTIER Act to ensure transparency and accountability, arguing that voluntary commitments are insufficient compared to legal requirements.