@addyosmani: Agentic coding terminals (and even many desktop apps) are too low-bandwidth for what agentic harnesses can actually do.…

X AI KOLs Following News

Summary

Addy Osmani argues that agentic coding terminals and desktop apps have low bandwidth for harnesses, advocating for cloud-native solutions accessible from anywhere. Patrick Collison adds that terminal-based harnesses have minimal UI affordances.

Agentic coding terminals (and even many desktop apps) are too low-bandwidth for what agentic harnesses can actually do. Excited for cloud-native harnesses that work on anything, accessible from anywhere to get even better. A lot of work is already pointing in this direction.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 08/17/26, 12:11 AM

Agentic coding terminals (and even many desktop apps) are too low-bandwidth for what agentic harnesses can actually do. Excited for cloud-native harnesses that work on anything, accessible from anywhere to get even better. A lot of work is already pointing in this direction.

Patrick Collison (@patrickc): I love agentic coding harnesses, but they shouldn’t be primarily terminal-based. The terminal is great for quick and precise commands, but information density is extremely low and UI affordances are minimal. Maybe provision of TUIs is worthwhile for occasional use (when

Similar Articles

favorite Agentic Coding Harness

Reddit r/LocalLLaMA

The author compares several agentic coding harnesses (Codex CLI, Claude Code, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Pi) and finds Pi the leanest and best for local models, praising its simplicity and compatibility with Qwen 27B-MXFP8.

Agentic Coding is a Trap

Lobsters Hottest

The article argues that agentic coding, where AI generates code and humans act as orchestrators, is a trap due to increased system complexity, skill atrophy, and vendor lock-in. It highlights the negative impact on developer learning and critical thinking, contrasting this new abstraction with historical programming shifts.