@Miles_Brundage: Notably, the report + an Ant employee said that they actually agree, but just are too busy to go through the work of sh…
Summary
The tweet discusses how an Ant employee agrees with a safety report but is too busy to share details, highlighting understaffing in AI safety, and references Claude's disagreement with Anthropic's redaction in the report.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 08/16/26, 12:00 PM
Notably, the report + an Ant employee said that they actually agree, but just are too busy to go through the work of sharing the details.
Which is… slightly better? But not that much?
People don’t realize how understaffed safety is at companies https://t.co/YQjrdJOulf
Nathan Calvin (@_NathanCalvin): Anthropic gave Claude Mythos additional private information and asked it to review Section 2 of their report. Claude disagrees with Anthropic’s decision to completely redact one incident from the covered period that Claude says is “among the most genuinely informative.”
Similar Articles
@Miles_Brundage: Agree more info should be shared but also, we already have more than enough evidence to be acting with greater urgency
Miles Brundage responds to reports that an Anthropic employee told Dwarkesh Patel they expect AI to match human AI research ability within nine months based on non-public evidence, arguing that enough evidence already exists to act with greater urgency and that labs should share more information publicly.
@Miles_Brundage: Not familiar w/ the details here but will repeat my refrain on this kind of thing: This being news that more than a few…
Miles Brundage comments that the news about OpenAI's safety head leaving being widely concerning indicates a policy failure, and calls for industry-wide safety standards and audits.
@TheAhmadOsman: Anthropic wants the public to see one thing: the careful lab, the safety lab, the grown-up in the room trying to keep f…
This article criticizes Anthropic for using safety rhetoric to justify anti-competitive practices, arguing that the company's control over AI access threatens openness and innovation.
@Miles_Brundage: Surprised to not see more commentary on this excerpt from the Opus 5.5 blog post: "We largely understand the risks toda…
A tweet critiques a statement from Anthropic's Opus 5.5 blog post, arguing that the claim about understanding and managing today's AI risks is obviously false.
@Miles_Brundage: It's clear that a lot of people at the AI companies have done some serious reflection in the past few months And it's a…
Miles Brundage notes that while many AI company employees have recently reflected seriously on their work, others still rush to ship what they see as fun and safe.