Transferability and operational reliability of a Prithvi crop classification foundation model under phenological and geographic shift across three continents
Summary
This paper evaluates the out-of-distribution performance of the Prithvi-EO-2.0 geospatial foundation model for crop classification across 37 events in 12 countries on three continents, finding accuracy declines driven largely by phenological misalignment rather than pure spatial transfer, and proposes no-retraining adjustments like class consolidation and observation-window compression to recover operational reliability.
Similar Articles
Do Foundation Model Embeddings Improve Cross-Country Crop Yield Generalisation? A Leave-One-Country-Out Evaluation in Sub-Saharan Africa
This paper evaluates whether geospatial foundation model embeddings like Prithvi-EO improve cross-country crop yield prediction in Sub-Saharan Africa compared to traditional Sentinel-2 features. The study finds that frozen embeddings do not significantly outperform spectral medians under rigorous Leave-One-Country-Out validation, suggesting country-level distribution shift is the primary bottleneck rather than feature representation quality.
Land cover and flood type govern the detection limits of satellite-based flood mapping across diverse global flood events
A study evaluating the Prithvi-EO-2.0 foundation model for satellite-based flood mapping across 19 diverse global flood events, finding that detection accuracy is jointly governed by land cover and flood type.
Quantifying geographic domain shift to decouple the geospatial transferability of human mobility flow generation models
This paper introduces geographic domain shift to quantify and analyze the transferability of human mobility flow generation models across regions, revealing spatial heterogeneity and providing a framework for improving GeoAI model development.
Scalable and Trustworthy Earth Observation Foundation Models
This chapter reviews design principles and current landscape of foundation models for Earth observation, highlighting the need for domain-specific adaptation, physically plausible representations, and consistent evaluation benchmarks. It includes case studies on harmful algal bloom prediction and adaptive monitoring station selection.
FairRSFM: A Biome-Aware Benchmark and Debiasing Framework for Remote Sensing Foundation Models
The paper introduces FairRSFM, a biome-aware benchmark and debiasing framework that reveals ecological performance disparities in remote-sensing foundation models, evaluating Prithvi-EO-2.0, SatMAE, and DOFA across four downstream datasets alongside mitigation baselines like BOLP, Dynamic Biome Reweighting, and GroupDRO.