Why production systems keep making “correct” decisions that are no longer right [D]
Summary
Analysis of a recurring failure pattern in production AI systems where technically correct decisions become contextually wrong as underlying assumptions shift, framed as the 'Formalisation Trap' where meaning gets locked into outdated structures.
Similar Articles
Something I keep seeing with AI projects that nobody talks about openly
This article highlights that many AI agent projects fail in production not because of model quality, but because teams launch without clearly defining what constitutes failure, missing critical edge cases that lead to confident incorrect outputs.
Why does AI still get things wrong when the knowledge base looks fine?
This article explores why AI systems still produce incorrect outputs even when their underlying knowledge base appears to be accurate.
Why are my agents failing in production?
The article explains that AI agents fail in production because they lack access to human reasoning and tacit knowledge needed to handle ambiguity, exceptions, and complex decisions.
AI systems often fail in ways that don’t show up in testing?
Discusses the common gap between clean benchmark-style testing environments and messy real-world usage in AI workflows, leading to production failures, and mentions evaluation platforms like Confident AI, Braintrust, and Langfuse.
An AI agent can pass every handoff and still be wrong. I think state is the production failure we’re under-testing.
The article discusses a critical yet often overlooked failure in AI agent production: state drift where agents operate from inconsistent realities despite correct handoffs, and proposes tests to identify such issues in long-running workflows.