Most companies have no idea what their AI actually costs — only 26% have full control over the spend
Summary
A KPMG study reveals that only 26% of companies have full control over their AI spending, with many flying blind; examples include Uber exhausting its Claude Code budget and Teradata diverting salary budgets to AI.
Similar Articles
Uber caps employee AI spending after blowing through budget in 4 months
Uber has implemented a monthly $1,500 cap per employee on AI coding tools like Claude Code and Cursor after exceeding its annual AI budget in just four months, highlighting growing AI cost concerns and ROI questions across the tech industry.
Uber Caps Usage of AI Tools Like Claude Code to Manage Costs
Uber is capping employee spending on AI coding tools like Claude Code to $1,500 per tool per month to manage costs after reportedly blowing its 2026 AI budget early. The policy highlights the growing expense of agentic coding software.
@rohanpaul_ai: This survey suggests over 80% of companies have seen no productivity gains from AI so far, despite billions in spending…
A survey of 6,000 executives finds that over 80% of companies report no productivity gains from AI, with a third of leaders using AI only 90 minutes per week, despite heavy investment. Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs predicts a 24x increase in token use by AI agents by 2030, raising cost concerns for companies like Uber and Microsoft.
Uber blows through its IT budget for AI for 2026 and it's only April citing rising costs of Claude Code
Uber’s CTO admits the company has already blown its 2026 AI budget by April, as widespread adoption of Claude Code and internal AI agents drives token-based costs far above projections.
Companies are letting AI gains go to waste, study says
A BCG study finds that 74% of non-managerial white-collar workers regularly use AI, saving at least a day per week, but many companies struggle to convert efficiency gains into measurable value.