Which AI tools actually find security issues, instead of just linting?
Summary
The article compares AI-powered security tools that detect real code vulnerabilities beyond basic linting, with mentions of tools like Snyk, Semgrep, and Coderabbit.
Similar Articles
The gap isn’t that AI security tools are bad, it’s that two good ones can’t agree on what they found
The post highlights how independent AI security scanners name the same behavioral vulnerabilities differently, creating tracking and audit overhead. It introduces AVE, an open-source taxonomy of stable IDs for agentic AI vulnerability classes, noting that an independent developer's scanner findings converged on the same IDs.
@hetmehtaa: Local AI for Penetration Testing & Research https://projectblack.io/blog/local-ai-for-cyber-security/…
A blog post benchmarks four approaches (Semgrep, GLM 5.1 with Strix, cloud SOTA with code review skill, and local AI with a custom harness) for finding a known LFI vulnerability in PHPIPAM, finding that the local AI harness with a tailored approach outperforms the others.
You can now give supercharge AI coding agent with its own senior dev instincts (drafting, testing, reviewing, exploiting, etc.)
Discusses how integrating tools like API Doctor, Socket, Semgrep, CodeRabbit, Postman, Playwright, GitHub Actions, Sentry, and PostHog can give AI coding agents senior-level instincts for code quality, security, and monitoring, shifting focus from speed to quality.
Introducing CodeMender: an AI agent for code security
Google DeepMind introduces CodeMender, an AI agent that automatically detects and fixes code security vulnerabilities using advanced reasoning and validation techniques. The system has already upstreamed 72 security fixes to open source projects over six months.
Skills are new linters
The author argues that using AI skills to automate code quality checks replicates the same memory and reliability issues that linters were originally designed to solve, questioning the effectiveness of LLM-based skills as replacements.