World models of environment, agent and joint agent-environment systems
Summary
This paper proposes a framework for world models in reinforcement learning by distinguishing between environment, agent, and joint system channels, using computational mechanics to define canonical predictive models and analyzing their complexity under coupling.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 08/24/26, 04:08 AM
# World models of environment, agent and joint agent-environment systems
Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20401](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20401)
[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.20401)
> Abstract:World models are a central component of model\-based reinforcement learning\. They are usually discussed in terms of what variables they predict, such as observations, rewards, states, latent or information states\. We argue that there is a prior distinction: which channel they model\. We consider three cases: the environment channel $O\_\{:\} \\mid A\_\{:\}$, the agent channel $A\_\{:\} \\mid O\_\{:\}$, and the realised joint process $\(A, O\)\_\{:\}$, equivalently viewed as a channel with no inputs\. Using computational mechanics, we define canonical predictive models for these three cases as $\\epsilon$\-transducers or $\\epsilon$\-machines\. Canonical environment models recover standard predictive state representations, while the other two give analogous notions of canonical models for the agent and the joint system\. We then build canonical support\-restricted environment and agent models induced by closed\-loop coupling, whose predictive equivalences range over continuations supported by the realised interaction\. The key structural result is that canonical support\-restricted environment states factor through the canonical joint causal states, and their transition structure is induced directly from the joint model; the agent\-side construction is dual\. Finally, we give a POMDP/controller example in which the unrestricted environment model has infinitely many states while the canonical support\-restricted model induced by the coupling is finite\. The framework clarifies what different world models are models of, and how coupling and support restriction can change their canonical predictive structure and complexity\.
## Submission history
From: Manuel Baltieri \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/0fa2b818/2608.20401)\] **\[v1\]**Thu, 23 Jul 2026 13:35:03 UTC \(1,816 KB\)Similar Articles
World Model for Robot Learning: A Comprehensive Survey
This comprehensive survey reviews the literature on world models for robot learning, covering their roles in policy learning, planning, and simulation. It highlights key paradigms, benchmarks, and future directions for predictive modeling in embodied agents.
A Definition and Roadmap for World Models
This academic paper provides a scientific definition of world models, discusses key technical aspects, and presents a staged roadmap for developing effective world models across AI subfields such as model-based reinforcement learning, video generation, and embodied robotics.
MultiWorld: Scalable Multi-Agent Multi-View Video World Models
MultiWorld is a unified framework for multi-agent multi-view video world modeling that achieves accurate control of multiple agents while maintaining multi-view consistency through a Multi-Agent Condition Module and Global State Encoder.
Agent-World: Scaling Real-World Environment Synthesis for Evolving General Agent Intelligence
Agent-World introduces a self-evolving training framework for general agent intelligence that autonomously discovers real-world environments and tasks via the Model Context Protocol, enabling continuous learning. Agent-World-8B and 14B models outperform strong proprietary models across 23 challenging agent benchmarks.
Beyond Next-Observation Prediction: Agent-Authored World Modeling for Sequential Decision Making
This paper introduces Agent-Authored World Modeling (AAWM), a training procedure that constructs world-model supervision based on the policy's own decision needs rather than next-observation prediction, aligning the learning objective with the dynamics required for effective decision-making.