@jakescottMD: The “covered up” data was published in the New England Journal of Medicine in September 2021, where it has sat, publicl…
Summary
A doctor refutes claims of covered-up vaccine miscarriage data by noting it was published publicly in NEJM, showing no increased risk, and explains the 82% figure results from a denominator error.
Similar Articles
I was wrong about the Midjourney ultra-sound scanner
Dr. Matthew Zirwas retracts his earlier dismissal of the Midjourney ultrasound scanner, acknowledging that if it is high-resolution, harmless, inexpensive, and convenient, frequent screening could overcome historical pitfalls of unnecessary invasive procedures, though he emphasizes that data is needed to confirm benefit.
Global review confirms mRNA vaccines are safe, effective and full of promise
A global review led by UBC researchers confirms that mRNA vaccines are safe and highly effective against COVID-19, and have potential applications for influenza, RSV, cancer, and autoimmune disorders, addressing misconceptions and supporting evidence-based decisions.
Scientific datasets are riddled with copy-paste errors
A software tool designed to detect data fabrication has uncovered copy-paste errors in scientific datasets across open-access repositories, including a highly-cited Parkinson's Disease study in Cell (2016) that has been publicly available for over 8 years without detection.
@SamaHoole: If you had trusted the settled science of the day, here is how it would have gone. 1890s: you dose the baby with Bayer'…
The article critiques historical scientific consensus that led to harmful medical and health outcomes, questioning current 'settled' practices and implying potential future disbelief in today's standards.
The Radiation Exposure Lie
This article argues that the perceived dangers of low-dose radiation from nuclear disasters are overstated, using Chernobyl data to show limited health impacts compared to other industrial disasters, and criticizes the resulting regulatory burden on nuclear power.