Linus Torvalds to critics of AI coding in Linux: "Fork it. Or just walk away."

# Linus Torvalds to critics of AI coding in Linux: "Fork it. Or just walk away." Source: [https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/07/linus-torvalds-to-critics-of-ai-coding-in-linux-fork-it-or-just-walk-away/](https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/07/linus-torvalds-to-critics-of-ai-coding-in-linux-fork-it-or-just-walk-away/) The widespread introduction of AI\-powered coding tools has[led to](https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/03/ai-can-rewrite-open-source-code-but-can-it-rewrite-the-license-too/)some[dramatic splits](https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/03/new-vibe-coded-ai-translation-tool-splits-the-video-game-preservation-community/)between those integrating those tools into their workflows and anti\-AI absolutists who don’t want large language model\-generated code anywhere near their projects\. When it comes to the Linux kernel, though, creator and top\-level maintainer Linus Torvalds said he is “willing to absolutely put my foot down” in support of using AI tools to improve the long\-standing open source project\. Writing in[a lengthy post on the Linux kernel mailing list](https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/CAHk-=wi4zC+Ze8e+p3tMv8TtG_80KzsZ1syL9anBtmEh5Z40vg@mail.gmail.com/)this week, Torvalds said that “Linux is not one of those anti\-AI projects, and if somebody has issues with that, they can do the open\-source thing and fork it\. Or just walk away\.” The statement came amid a lengthy thread arguing about the use of[Sashiko](https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko), an “agentic Linux kernel code review system” that its creators claim can, in tests, independently find 53\.6 percent of the bugs that would end up being fixed by human coders in later commits\. But the tool can also waste maintainers’ time by sending “false positive” reports of bugs that don’t exist, at a rate Sashiko’s maintainers estimate is “well within \[the\] 20% range\.” In discussing whether maintainers should be subjected to a flood of these kinds of automated, AI\-powered bug report emails \(true or false\), one poster cited[the Software Freedom Conservancy’s recent statement](https://sfconservancy.org/llm-gen-ai/llm-backed-generative-ai-recommendations.html)that the open source community “should support, not just tolerate, those who outright reject LLM\-gen\-AI systems” and that “every FOSS contributor deserves self\-determination regarding LLM\-gen\-AI\.” In the face of that statement, Torvalds said that he rejects those who demand that their open source projects not accept any LLM\-generated code or revisions\. “We’re not forcing anybody to use \[LLM tools\], but I will very loudly ignore people who try to argue against other people from using it,” Torvalds said\.