How accurate do you think this is? Qwen3.5 9B vs GPT-4o
Summary
The post questions whether Qwen 3.5 9B running on low-resource systems can outperform GPT-4o, highlighting its small size of less than 7 GB and claimed superior performance.
Similar Articles
@populartourist: Qwen3.6 27B and 35B-A3B are amazing models, but nothing reaches the efficiency of GPT-OSS yet. Qwen3.6 35B-A3B is as fa…
A tweet comparing Qwen3.6 27B and 35B-A3B models to GPT-OSS, noting that while Qwen models are fast, GPT-OSS is more efficient, especially in prefill performance.
Qwen3.8 27B = GPT-5.6 Luna compressed into 27B
The article claims that the Qwen3.8 27B model is equivalent to a compressed version of GPT-5.6 Luna, suggesting significant advancements in model efficiency and performance.
I just ran Qwen 3.8 27 in Q4 against GPT 5.6 Sol high - and it easily won against SOL - complex animated SVG tasks
A user tested Qwen 3.8 27B in Q4 quantization against GPT 5.6 SOL in complex animated SVG tasks and found that Qwen performed better with fewer errors, highlighting strengths in spatial reasoning and coding.
Qwen3.7 Max scored by Artificial Analysis, 27B/35B waiting room
Qwen3.7 Max ranks 5th on Artificial Analysis benchmarks, matching GPT-5.4 and outperforming Gemini 3.5 Flash, while Qwen3.6 27B trails significantly.
GPT-5, the world best model just 1 year ago, is today inferior to Qwen3.6 27B and most today’s low-tier models
GPT-5, which was the best model just a year ago, is now outperformed by Qwen3.6 27B and other current low-tier models, highlighting the rapid pace of AI advancement.