Qwen3.7 Max scored by Artificial Analysis, 27B/35B waiting room
Summary
Qwen3.7 Max ranks 5th on Artificial Analysis benchmarks, matching GPT-5.4 and outperforming Gemini 3.5 Flash, while Qwen3.6 27B trails significantly.
Similar Articles
Qwen 3.6 27B on DeepSWE
Qwen 3.6 27B scored 2% on the DeepSWE benchmark, placing 18/20 above Haiku 4.5 and Minimax M2.7, highlighting the gap between local and leading-edge models.
Qwen 3.8 27B scores 52 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
The Qwen 3.8 27B AI model achieved a score of 52 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, as highlighted in a blog post by Simon Willison.
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores 45 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, up 5 points in a month and back on top of China's leaderboard, nosing out GLM-5.3 (44.9) and Kimi K3 (43.8)
Qwen3.8 Max has been upgraded and now leads China's AI leaderboard with a score of 45 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, surpassing GLM-5.3 and Kimi K3 after a 30-day improvement to the 2.4T MoE model.
Qwen 3.8 27B Aider score
A user benchmarks Qwen 3.8 27B using Aider and finds it scores 72.9, matching Gemini 2.5 Pro and outperforming other state-of-the-art models on a MacBook with local inference via vLLM.
Qwen 3.8 27B in 9th position on code arena. Gemma 4 31B is 80th.
Qwen3.8-27B by Alibaba Qwen achieves 9th place on the Code Arena benchmark with 1595 points, outperforming larger models like Gemma 4-31B and reshaping the Pareto Frontier in coding performance.