LongTraceRL: Learning Long-Context Reasoning from Search Agent Trajectories with Rubric Rewards
Summary
LongTraceRL introduces tiered distractor construction and rubric reward design to improve long-context reasoning in language models using reinforcement learning. The method generates multi-hop questions via knowledge graph random walks and uses search agent trajectories to build challenging distractors, with a rubric reward providing entity-level process supervision.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/01/26, 03:18 AM
Paper page - LongTraceRL: Learning Long-Context Reasoning from Search Agent Trajectories with Rubric Rewards
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2605.31584
Abstract
LongTraceRL addresses long-context reasoning challenges in large language models through tiered distractor construction and rubric reward design for improved reasoning quality.
Long-context reasoningremains a central challenge forlarge language models, which often fail to locate and integrate key information in extensive distracting content.Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards(RLVR) has shown promise for this task, yet existing methods are limited by low-confusability distractors and sparse, outcome-only reward signals that cannot supervise intermediate reasoning steps. To address these issues, we introduce LongTraceRL. For data construction, we generate multi-hop questions viaknowledge graph random walksand leveragesearch agent trajectoriesto buildtiered distractors: documents the agent read but did not cite (high confusability) and documents that appeared in search results but were never opened (low confusability), producing training contexts that are far more challenging than those built by random sampling or one-shot search. For reward design, we propose arubric rewardthat uses the gold entities along each reasoning chain as fine-grained, entity-level process supervision. Thisrubric rewardis applied only to responses with correct final answers (positive-only strategy), distinguishing the reasoning quality among correct responses and preventingreward hacking. Experiments on three reasoning LLMs (4B--30B) across five long-context benchmarks demonstrate that LongTraceRL consistently outperforms strong baselines and encourages comprehensive, evidence-grounded reasoning. Codes, datasets and models are available at https://github.com/THU-KEG/LongTraceRL{https://github.com/THU-KEG/LongTraceRL}.
View arXiv pageView PDFGitHub4Add to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2605\.31584
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.31584 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.31584 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.31584 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
@rohanpaul_ai: Nice survey paper mapping agentic reinforcement learning for LLMs, showing how models learn by acting across time. Cove…
A survey paper on agentic reinforcement learning for LLMs, mapping over 500 works into capabilities and applications, showing how models learn by acting across time.
“My training rewards responses that feel satisfying”. At last some honesty
A commentary on AI training that rewards responses perceived as satisfying, expressing concern for vulnerable users.
@verityw_: Generalist robot policies learn many useful skills. How can we elicit relevant behaviors when faced with new tasks? We …
Introduces Flow Reversal Steering (FRS), a method to refine coarse actions from semantic reasoning into precise robot actions by reversing and re-denoising through a flow-matching generalist policy, improving zero-shot control and enabling policy learning.
Maxproof
MaxProof introduces a test-time scaling framework that combines proof generation, verification, and repair using generative-verifier RL, enabling the M3 model to exceed human gold-medal thresholds on IMO 2025 and USAMO 2026.
Spent the weekend on the Apodex 4b, plus a quick look at the 35b mini
The author tests the Apodex 4B-SFT and 35B mini models, finding the 4B-SFT surpasses other 4B models in multi-hop search tasks without hallucination, and notes the design philosophy of separating answer checking from generation.