Why 80% of AI projects fail: Stop treating LLMs like SaaS and start treating them like Infrastructure.
Summary
Argues that most AI projects fail because organizations treat LLMs as simple SaaS products rather than complex infrastructure requiring technical rigor.
Similar Articles
Why Are So Many Agentic AI Projects Failing?
Discusses the common reasons why agentic AI projects fail in enterprise environments, focusing on infrastructure, legacy systems, data fragmentation, and governance challenges.
@akshay_pachaar: 95% of enterprise AI projects fail to deliver. but rarely because the model is bad. they fail because teams can’t answe…
Discusses why 95% of enterprise AI projects fail due to governance, ROI, and deployment issues, and promotes a free book by a veteran practitioner covering frameworks and patterns.
The minimum viable unit of saleable software
An essay exploring how LLMs have shifted the buy-vs-build calculus for software, arguing that while AI lowers build costs, maintenance and human oversight still make building a non-trivial investment, using the example of replacing Jira with an LLM-built internal tool.
Something I keep seeing with AI projects that nobody talks about openly
This article highlights that many AI agent projects fail in production not because of model quality, but because teams launch without clearly defining what constitutes failure, missing critical edge cases that lead to confident incorrect outputs.
Most AI agents fail because people build them like chatbots
Many AI agent implementations fail because they treat agents like chatbots, relying on chat history for state rather than using deterministic data structures. The article advocates for separating reasoning (LLM), actions (tools), workflow progress (state machine), and external triggers (webhooks) to build reliable business agents.