DAR: Deontic Reasoning with Agentic Harnesses
Summary
This paper introduces DAR (Deontic Agentic Reasoning), an agentic framework enabling LLMs to interactively query statutes and policies for legal/regulatory reasoning tasks. Evaluated on DeonticBench, results show agentic harnesses improve frontier models but can degrade weaker models on numerical tasks while consuming more tokens.
Similar Articles
best of the best agentic harnesses do this…
The author shares insights on building effective agent harnesses: the best ones minimize LLM reliance for trivial tasks and reserve LLMs for complex reasoning, distinguishing genuine harnesses from simple wrappers.
Adaptive Latent Agentic Reasoning
This paper introduces Adaptive Latent Agentic Reasoning (ALAR), a dual-mode framework for LLM agents that uses compact latent reasoning for routine turns and selectively escalates to explicit chain-of-thought for harder decisions, achieving up to 84.6% token reduction while maintaining task accuracy.
Deontic Policies for Runtime Governance of Agentic AI Systems
This paper proposes AgenticRei, a framework for runtime governance of LLM-driven agentic AI systems using deontic policies expressed in OWL, enabling obligations, dispensations, and conflict resolution beyond traditional policy engines.
L-MAD: A Systematic Evaluation of Multi-Agent Debate Structures in Legal Reasoning
The paper introduces L-MAD, a framework for systematically evaluating multi-agent debate structures in legal textual entailment. It finds that increasing agent population improves accuracy but more debate rounds cause over-deliberation, with improvements of up to 8% over single-agent baselines.
The Legora Benchmark for Agentic Reasoning (4 minute read)
Legora introduces the Legora BAR benchmark for evaluating AI agentic reasoning in legal workflows, using real cases and the Legora harness to measure system-level performance.