@Saccc_c: Beginners in AI Coding often overlook the crucial "review" step, causing bugs to pile up. But you can easily use Codex's built-in /review feature to quickly perform code review. It's simple, just two steps: 1. Set up an independent context for review mode, allowing it to start a new session for code review, to avoid...

X AI KOLs Following Tools

Summary

Introduces a two-step method for code review using Codex's built-in /review feature, and mentions adversarial review techniques to improve AI review effectiveness.

Beginners in AI Coding often overlook the crucial "review" step, causing bugs to pile up. But you can easily use Codex's built-in /review feature to quickly perform code review. It's simple, just two steps: 1. Set up an independent context for review mode, allowing it to start a new session for code review, to avoid interference from previous sessions on the review results. Path: Settings > Git > Code Review Send Method > select "Independent" 2. Simply type /review in Codex, select the code review mode, then choose the content you want to review. Note: You need to initialize git for the project before you can enter code review mode.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 08/12/26, 10:34 PM

Beginners often miss the critical “review” step in AI coding, causing bugs to pile up. But you can easily leverage Codex’s built-in /review feature to quickly perform code review.

The operation is simple, just two steps:

  1. Set up an independent context for review mode so it starts a new session for code review, avoiding interference from previous sessions on the review results.

Path: Settings > Git > Code review sending method, select “Independent”

  1. Simply type /review in Codex, select the code review mode, and then choose the content you want to review.

Note: You need to initialize git for the project before it will allow entering code review mode.

余温 (@gkxspace): Having AI do an “adversarial review” of the response is an excellent trick!

Now I’m used to adding “do an adversarial review of the results” at the end of my conversations with AI.

Of course, you can also directly call Claude or Codex’s built-in code-review feature.

But in many cases, review by the same model isn’t very effective, so you can also call a different model to do the review.

Similar Articles

@thinkszyg: The AI Coding Speed Paradox: Coding 48% Faster, Review 6x Slower. How to Rebuild the Review Process? SD Times Analyzes Data from 250,000 Developers: AI Boosts Coding Speed by 48-58%, But AI-Generated PRs Get Stuck in Review for 4-6x Longer…

X AI KOLs Timeline

The article points out that AI coding increases coding speed by 48-58%, but code review time increases by 4-6x, and security vulnerabilities also rise. It proposes a three-step plan to rebuild the review process: AI pre-review, focusing on architectural decisions, and using Microsoft's open-source ASSERT framework for behavioral verification.

@vintcessun: Alibaba open-sourced a code review tool. The core idea is interesting — a hybrid architecture of deterministic engineering + Agent. Common issues with pure LLM review: incomplete coverage, line number drift, and unstable quality. It uses a deterministic pipeline for file selection, grouping, and rule matching, while the Agent is only responsible for dynamic decision-making and context...

X AI KOLs Timeline

Alibaba open-sourced Open Code Review, an AI code review CLI tool that adopts a hybrid architecture of deterministic engineering and Agent. It has been running internally for two years and has discovered millions of defects.

@ai_super_niko: 1/5 Use Claude Code to write code, switch to Codex for review, then switch back to fix. Every switch is a murder of your train of thought. You're not writing code, you're running yourself ragged. Until OpenAI released an official plugin for their competitor Claude Code: `code…

X AI KOLs Timeline

OpenAI launched an official plugin codex-plugin-cc for their competitor Claude Code, used to integrate Codex into Claude Code for code review, sparking discussion about workflow switching efficiency.

@Smartpigai: Previously the official AI code review assistant within Alibaba Group, it has served tens of thousands of developers and identified millions of code defects over the past two years. Now it is open-sourced: Open Code Review. It is not about having AI 'casually glance at a diff', but about engineering AI Code Review. It…

X AI KOLs Timeline

Alibaba has open-sourced its internal AI code review assistant Open Code Review, an engineered CLI tool for code review that reads Git diffs and generates structured review comments with line-level annotations.

@Ryrenz: Most people using coding AI just say “help me fix this bug,” then spend half an hour wrestling with it. Change the phrasing and it gets it right the first time. 1. Have it look before acting “Don't write code yet. Read the relevant files and tell me how this feature currently works; I'll confirm before you change it.” 2. Stuck bug “Don't guess. Add log…

X AI KOLs Timeline

A practical tip on how to use coding AI more effectively. It lists 12 concrete prompt examples—such as having the AI read the code before modifying it, changing only the necessary parts, and writing rules into AGENTS.md—to reduce back-and-forth and make the rules stick long-term.