AgentProofBench: Benchmarking Reusable Verifiers for Web Agents
Summary
AgentProofBench introduces a benchmark for reusable verification in web agents, linking frozen acceptance rules to execution traces across 97 tasks and 79 families on four web services, establishing baselines for program-gate correctness and reuse using DeepSeek Flash/Pro.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 10/28/26, 02:01 AM
Paper page - AgentProofBench: Benchmarking Reusable Verifiers for Web Agents
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2610.34634
Abstract
AgentProofBench evaluates reusable web-agent verification by linking frozen acceptance rules to execution traces, establishing baseline measurements for program-gate correctness and reuse.
Reusable Web-agent verification requires a rule to follow changing requirements and support subsequent execution. We introduce AgentProofBench, which connects paired tests of a frozen acceptance rule to execution from identical saved openings. The resource spans 97 tasks, 79 families, and four Web services. Experiments withDeepSeek Flash/Pro establish two linked measurements. Across 48 families, complete-panel and decision-replay tests retain 82/96 Flash and 79/96 Pro source programs; paired reuse-rebuild BA intervals are [-5.47, 1.57] and [-10.16, 0.00] percentage points. Across 22 execution families, deployment-state panel correctness separates program assignments whose two saved openings are both delivered correctly: 32/33 assignments with error-free panels, versus 1/11 with panel errors. All reference-defined program-gate regressions and withheld deliveries occur in the latter group. Neutral continuation attains the highest correct delivery under the tested generic feedback, providing a concrete baseline for measuring the value added by a gate. Released instructions, states, programs, reference rules, and trajectories connect each test failure to its execution consequences. AgentProofBench makes reusable verification assessable at both the requirement and policy levels.
View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageGitHub0Add to collection
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.34634 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.34634 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.34634 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
VerifierBench: Benchmarking the Generation of Executable Verifiers for LLM Agents
VerifierBench introduces a benchmark of 222 tasks and 4,993 hidden test cases to evaluate how well LLM agents generate executable verifiers, finding that verifiers tend to over-reject valid solutions due to hidden assumptions that survive self-testing.
SWE-Bench Pro Verified: A Reliable Benchmark for Software Engineering Agents
SWE-Bench Pro Verified addresses reliability issues in the SWE-Bench Pro benchmark by eliminating reward hacking and improving task quality, providing a more accurate evaluation for software engineering agents.
AJ-Bench: Benchmarking Agent-as-a-Judge for Environment-Aware Evaluation
AJ-Bench introduces a benchmark to evaluate Agent-as-a-Judge systems that interact with environments to verify agent behaviors across 155 tasks in search, data systems, and GUI domains.
ClawProBench: Trace-Aware Evaluation of AI Agents with Runtime Coverage and Frozen Workplace-Style Holdouts
ClawProBench introduces a trace-aware benchmark for evaluating AI agents, emphasizing runtime execution and safety to reveal limitations in final-answer rankings.
Agent-ValueBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Agent Values
This paper introduces Agent-ValueBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the values of autonomous agents, revealing that agent values diverge from their underlying language models.