@vasuman: There's a lot of noise around AI regulation these days as Kimi, Qwen, and GLM keep surpassing people's expectations of …
Summary
The author argues that open-source AI progress cannot be stopped, and that US regulation will only hinder its own progress while China advances, despite concerns about open-source superintelligence.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/21/26, 02:46 PM
There’s a lot of noise around AI regulation these days as Kimi, Qwen, and GLM keep surpassing people’s expectations of what open-source AI is capable of.
I said this a year ago, and I will say it again. 3 things are true:
- You cannot stop open-source progress. You can try, and maybe even pretend you have, but you cannot stop it.
- The US may regulate, but China will not.
- There are perverse incentives at play for the AI labs, as well as the VCs and government officials with their wealth tied up in them. Open-source hurts their narrative, so they paint it as a demon to be stopped in the hopes that their AI bags stay secure. In reality, all this does is guarantee China’s success over the United States.
Do I think an open-source superintelligence available to everyone, including every bad actor, is a good thing? Absolutely not.
Do I think there’s anything we can do to stop it globally? Absolutely not. China will not play by our rules.
The only way to proceed is forward.
vas (@vasuman): You can have your personal opinions about AI safety, but what you cannot deny is that the rest of the world does not play by our rules.
The more legislation the United States passes around AI in the name of regulation and safety, the slower our progress becomes.
Our
Similar Articles
Open source AI being slightly behind is the best possible scenario
The author argues that the current situation where open source AI models are slightly behind proprietary frontier models is optimal, as it maintains competitive pressure and investment while preventing any single entity from dominating. They warn against cheering for Western AI failure, as it could lead to a Chinese monopoly and stalled development.
@GergelyOrosz: The disclosure about open AI models (+worries about the impact on the US leading the AI race) fails to account for how …
Gergely Orosz argues that concerns about open AI models undermining US leadership ignore that top AI inference companies are US-based; capable Chinese open models like Kimi K3 can instead strengthen US startups by leveraging advanced chips.
An OpenAI exec's comments on China's Kimi K3 kicked off a big US tech debate
An OpenAI executive's comments on China's Kimi K3 model sparked a debate in Silicon Valley about open versus closed AI models, highlighting growing strategic divides between US and Chinese approaches to AI development.
@levie: AI regulation is far less simple than it looks. It’s prisoners dilemma at insane scale. In theory if all leading AI lab…
A Twitter user argues that AI regulation is a complex prisoners' dilemma at a global scale, highlighting the trade-offs between US regulation, Chinese advancement, and geopolitical competitiveness.
US Considers Banning Kimi K3 & Other Open Source Models
The US is considering banning open source AI models, including Kimi K3, which could significantly impact the open source AI community and global AI regulation.