@vasuman: There's a lot of noise around AI regulation these days as Kimi, Qwen, and GLM keep surpassing people's expectations of …
Summary
The author argues that open-source AI progress cannot be stopped, and that US regulation will only hinder its own progress while China advances, despite concerns about open-source superintelligence.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/21/26, 02:46 PM
There’s a lot of noise around AI regulation these days as Kimi, Qwen, and GLM keep surpassing people’s expectations of what open-source AI is capable of.
I said this a year ago, and I will say it again. 3 things are true:
- You cannot stop open-source progress. You can try, and maybe even pretend you have, but you cannot stop it.
- The US may regulate, but China will not.
- There are perverse incentives at play for the AI labs, as well as the VCs and government officials with their wealth tied up in them. Open-source hurts their narrative, so they paint it as a demon to be stopped in the hopes that their AI bags stay secure. In reality, all this does is guarantee China’s success over the United States.
Do I think an open-source superintelligence available to everyone, including every bad actor, is a good thing? Absolutely not.
Do I think there’s anything we can do to stop it globally? Absolutely not. China will not play by our rules.
The only way to proceed is forward.
vas (@vasuman): You can have your personal opinions about AI safety, but what you cannot deny is that the rest of the world does not play by our rules.
The more legislation the United States passes around AI in the name of regulation and safety, the slower our progress becomes.
Our
Similar Articles
@VraserX: China is closing the AI gap despite US chip restrictions. That should kill the fantasy that America can simply regulate…
The post argues that China is closing the AI gap despite US chip restrictions, emphasizing that sustainable dominance requires technological advancement over regulation.
Open source AI being slightly behind is the best possible scenario
The author argues that the current situation where open source AI models are slightly behind proprietary frontier models is optimal, as it maintains competitive pressure and investment while preventing any single entity from dominating. They warn against cheering for Western AI failure, as it could lead to a Chinese monopoly and stalled development.
Is open source AI actually keeping up anymore?
The article questions whether open-source AI is keeping up with closed AI, noting that Chinese labs are catching up quickly, which challenges the notion of a clear US lead in AI.
@GergelyOrosz: The disclosure about open AI models (+worries about the impact on the US leading the AI race) fails to account for how …
Gergely Orosz argues that concerns about open AI models undermining US leadership ignore that top AI inference companies are US-based; capable Chinese open models like Kimi K3 can instead strengthen US startups by leveraging advanced chips.
An OpenAI exec's comments on China's Kimi K3 kicked off a big US tech debate
An OpenAI executive's comments on China's Kimi K3 model sparked a debate in Silicon Valley about open versus closed AI models, highlighting growing strategic divides between US and Chinese approaches to AI development.