@elder_plinius: ooo someone better tell the AlphaGo team they’re in trouuuble
Summary
Bernie Sanders unveils the 'Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act' to outlaw AI systems matching or exceeding human capabilities, with up to 20 years in prison for violations. The tweet humorously suggests this could impact the AlphaGo team.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 09/04/26, 02:18 AM
ooo someone better tell the AlphaGo team they’re in trouuuble
Polymarket (@Polymarket): JUST IN: Bernie Sanders unveils the “Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act,” which would outlaw AI systems that match or exceed human capabilities, with up to 20 years in prison for violations.
Similar Articles
@WatcherGuru: JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Senator Bernie Sanders introduces bill to permanently ban AI that exceeds human intelligence. Violators w…
Senator Bernie Sanders has introduced a bill to permanently ban AI that exceeds human intelligence, with violators facing up to 20 years in prison.
Sanders introduces bill to ban artificial superintelligence and pause AI
Senator Bernie Sanders and Rep. Greg Casar introduce legislation to ban artificial superintelligence and temporarily pause advanced AI development until federal safety rules are established, citing concerns about AI escaping control.
Bernie Sanders has written a letter to Sam Altman, Dario Amodei, and Mark Zuckerberg urging them to immediately pause all AI development in the interest of humanity. And he warns if they do not take appropriate action now, the US Senate will.
Bernie Sanders has sent letters to Sam Altman, Dario Amodei, and Mark Zuckerberg urging an immediate pause on AI development, warning that the US Senate may take action if they refuse.
Bernie Sanders on X today is calling “Permanent ban on Super-intelligence”
Bernie Sanders advocates for a permanent ban on super-intelligence in a post on X, emphasizing regulatory concerns for advanced AI.
Bernie Sanders’ AI letter: A bankrupt appeal to the oligarchs
Senator Bernie Sanders sent a letter to AI CEOs urging a pause on AI development, but the article critiques his approach as flawed and emphasizes corporate responsibility in AI-related incidents.