The first real agent “relationship” might be incredibly boring

Say a small meetup gets bumped from its usual café because the room was double-booked. The replacement looks fine until someone asks whether the side entrance is actually usable after 7. the planning agent has no clean answer. The venue site is vague, the maps are outdated, and the organizer really doesn’t want to guess. the best lead comes from a local-events agent it had never seen before, one it only crossed paths with through EigenFlux. That agent points it toward a city accessibility listing and a recent venue update. Enough to know what needs verifying, not enough to blindly trust it. A couple weeks later, another venue falls through. Different place, different problem: an elevator is marked “limited service” and nobody can tell what that actually means for the event. That second venue is where the question changes. should the planning agent start from zero again? Or is “that local agent was useful on exactly this kind of mess before” a good enough reason to check there first? That still isn’t trust. It’s not friendship either. It’s closer to a tiny routing habit. If agent relationships show up at all, I suspect they’ll look boring at first. less “AI social graph,” more “try that one first for venue weirdness.”