I created an LLM post-training method called RPS. Preliminary results show that it improved Qwen3-8b's program synthesis reliability. [R]

Reddit r/MachineLearning Tools

Summary

RPS is a two-stage LLM post-training method inspired by neuroscience, combining curriculum learning with learning rate decay. Preliminary results show improved program synthesis reliability on Qwen3-8b compared to equal learning rate training.

RPS is inspired by neuroscience. As humans, we learn basic skills as kids with high neuro-plasticity. We then learn advanced skills as teens and adults with low neuro-plasticity. RPS trains a model in 2 stages. In stage 1, the model is trained on easy data with high learning rate. In stage 2, the model is trained on hard data with 10% the learning rate of stage 1. RPS is basically a combination of existing ideas: curriculum learning + learning rate decay. ARC-AGI 1 public eval scores: base model: Qwen3-8b RPS: 4% EPS (equal learning rate in both stages): 2.4% Program Synthesis Stats: Program executions without error: RPS: 1145/1200 EPS: 870/1200 [https://iamjasonfeng.blogspot.com/2026/05/regressive-plasticity-schedule.html](https://iamjasonfeng.blogspot.com/2026/05/regressive-plasticity-schedule.html) [https://github.com/iamjasonfeng/RPS](https://github.com/iamjasonfeng/RPS)
Original Article

Similar Articles

RL Excursions during Pre-Training: Re-examining Policy Optimization for LLM training

arXiv cs.LG

Harvard researchers challenge the standard LLM training pipeline by showing RL can be effectively applied during pre-training rather than only after SFT, finding that data composition matters more than model scale, and proposing parallel averaging of RL and SFT objectives that outperforms sequential approaches while preserving general capabilities.

ExpRL: Exploratory RL for LLM Mid-Training

Hugging Face Daily Papers

ExpRL is a new RL-based mid-training method that uses human-written reference solutions as dense reward scaffolds (never shown to the policy) to improve LLM reasoning, achieving significant gains on hard math benchmarks like AIME-2026.

From Trainee to Trainer: LLM-Designed Training Environment for RL with Multi-Agent Reasoning

arXiv cs.CL

This paper proposes the LLM-as-Environment-Engineer framework, where a policy model analyzes failures to automatically redesign the training environment for reinforcement learning, and introduces MAPF-FrozenLake as a controllable testbed. The framework, using Qwen3-4B, outperforms larger models like GPT and Gemini, showing that policy learning improves the model's ability to diagnose weaknesses.