Benchmarks are an unreliable measure of difficulty
Summary
论文研究了基准测试中问题难度和框架方式如何影响模型训练分数的观测提升,指出许多基准隐性地加权了特定难度区域,其排行榜结论需谨慎解读,部分基准甚至覆盖不足难度轴,难以有效监控模型改进过程。
Similar Articles
Your Benchmark Is an Empirical Measure Over Difficulty
This paper formalizes benchmark evaluation as an empirical measure over question difficulty, identifying failure modes like measure mismatch and coverage gaps, and proposes diagnostic metrics plus BenchFill, a difficulty-targeted item rewriting algorithm, with analysis across 25 popular benchmarks in 7 domains.
Artificial Analysis v5 and the benchmarker's dilemma (11 minute read)
Interconnects 分析了 Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5 的更新,探讨独立 AI 评测在快速迭代时代面临的'单一分数'困境,以及各基准权重分配对模型排名和市场的影响。
Are We Testing Too Much? A Survey of Benchmark Compression for Efficient Evaluation of Large Language Models
一篇系统综述,回顾了119篇关于大语言模型基准压缩的论文,提出了涵盖单基准内压缩、跨基准套件压缩及自适应评估的分类体系,旨在降低LLM评估成本并提升可靠性。
we benchmark models nobody actually runs
The article critiques the lack of systematic benchmarking for AI models in different quantization formats, highlighting discrepancies between benchmark results and real-world usage, and calls for more thorough evaluation.
@0xLogicrw: Alibaba Tongyi Lab launches Agent Evaluation Benchmark PawBench v1.0, for the first time integrating base models and runtime frameworks into a unified evaluation system. The evaluation cross-tests 9 large models with three frameworks: Hermes, OpenClaw, and QwenPaw, covering 150 real-world tasks and 4050 ...
Alibaba Tongyi Lab launches Agent Evaluation Benchmark PawBench v1.0, for the first time integrating base models and runtime frameworks into a unified evaluation system, covering 9 models and 3 frameworks with 150 tasks. It finds that framework design significantly affects agent performance, and proposes four design principles.