@chrmanning: Will there be an AI jobpocalypse? My view gyrates wildly—depending on my mood and who I talked to recently I think this…

X AI KOLs Following News

Summary

Chris Manning reflects on the uncertainty around AI's impact on jobs, citing Dan Shipper's observation that AI agents have not reduced human work but increased demand, leading to more hiring.

Will there be an AI jobpocalypse? My view gyrates wildly—depending on my mood and who I talked to recently I think this is totally reasonable No one in tech has special training or insight on future employment trends Economists have some training, but they’re uncertain too 🤔
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 05/27/26, 05:02 AM

Will there be an AI jobpocalypse?

My view gyrates wildly—depending on my mood and who I talked to recently

I think this is totally reasonable

No one in tech has special training or insight on future employment trends

Economists have some training, but they’re uncertain too 🤔

Dan Shipper 📧 (@danshipper): We’ve automated every single thing we can @every with AI agents.

And yet there’s way more human work to do than ever. We’ve gone from 4 -> 30 human employees since GPT-3.

I wrote a report on the structural reasons: how AI makes expert competence cheap, why that drives up demand

Similar Articles

The AI jobs debate just got messier

TechCrunch AI

A report from Ramp and Revelio Labs finds that companies heavily investing in AI are growing headcount faster, including entry-level roles, countering fears of AI-driven job losses, though the data skews towards tech-forward firms.